PSMR ranks 3rd and GJUL 24th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
GJUL vs PSMR
PSMR −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
GJUL 27.2×the volume
29.5K1.08K
GJUL +1.7pt
+13.6%+11.9%
GJUL vs PSMR Performance
+9.1%+12.5%
- GJUL 0.85%
- PSMR 0.49%, better
- GJUL $403M
- PSMR $90M
- GJUL +9.1%
- PSMR +12.5%, better
- GJUL 3
- PSMR 3
- GJUL 29.5K sh, better
- PSMR 1.08K sh
- GJUL $43.78
- PSMR $32.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GJUL | PSMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C53 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | B64 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. GJUL and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GJULC
PSMRB
In short
GJUL The July door into First Trust's moderate-buffer lineup: it aims to absorb the first 15% of an S&P 500 ETF price decline over a one-year outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap set when that period begins.
PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.
Stated mandate
GJUL The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 13.82% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses during the July 20, 2026–July 16, 2027 target outcome period.
PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GJUL vs PSMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GJUL vs PSMR Cost
Overpaying GJUL vs PSMR
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GJUL 0.85%
$16,199
PSMR 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GJUL | PSMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%GJUL
- 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds
GJUL 37th cheapest of 51 funds
GJUL vs PSMR Dividends
- GJUL None
- PSMR None
Distribution history
GJUL vs PSMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GJUL 6.0%PSMR 6.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- GJUL 1.55, betterPSMR 1.31
- Worst fall
- GJUL −10.7%PSMR −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GJUL 0.48PSMR 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.