Skip to content

GJUL vs PSMJ

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July

GJULCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.36pt a year

GJUL0.85%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GJUL 4.9×the volume

GJUL29.5KPSMJ5.98K

3Y return · a year

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

GJUL+13.6%PSMJ+13.6%

GJUL vs PSMJ Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+9.1%GJUL+8.5%PSMJ

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. GJUL +9.1%. PSMJ +8.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GJUL 0.85%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
GJUL $403M
PSMJ $106M
1Y total return
GJUL +9.1%, better
PSMJ +8.5%
Yield (12M)
GJUL No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
GJUL 3
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
GJUL 29.5K sh, better
PSMJ 5.98K sh
NAV per share
GJUL $43.78
PSMJ $33.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GJUL: Cost 13, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 65, Durability 73. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for GJUL, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGJULPSMJ
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53C53
Tradability15% weightA72HigherC48
Holdings10% weightB65Not scored
Durability5% weightA73HigherB64

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GJUL and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and GJUL 24th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 24CGFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 43
  5. Rank 24CGJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JulyScore 43
  6. Rank 24CGOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GJULCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

GJUL The July door into First Trust's moderate-buffer lineup: it aims to absorb the first 15% of an S&P 500 ETF price decline over a one-year outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap set when that period begins.

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

GJUL The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 13.82% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses during the July 20, 2026–July 16, 2027 target outcome period.

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • GJUL The first 15% of the reference ETF's price loss over each outcome period is absorbed by the option structure, not by a manager's judgment call.
  • Twelve month-stamped siblings run the same 15% recipe, so the calendar start is your choice. This one resets in July.
  • The reference is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, so the only moving parts are the buffer and the cap. No sector tilts, no stock picking.
  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • GJUL At 0.85%, it runs above the buffer-cohort median of 0.79%. Laddered peers like BUFF charge 0.10% and spread start dates for you.
  • Buffer and cap apply to the full outcome period. Buy or sell partway through and you own part of a buffer and part of a cap, priced by the options.
  • It targets price return, so S&P 500 dividends are not part of the package.
  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full GJUL profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

GJUL vs PSMJ Holdings

How GJUL and PSMJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

About this figure: GJUL holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors98.3%
  • Countryby domicile99.98%

Sector

Sector weights in GJUL and PSMJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in GJULMore in PSMJGap
TechnologyGJUL +1.2 points
CommunicationGJUL +0.5 points
Health CarePSMJ +0.5 points
FinancialsPSMJ +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesPSMJ +0.3 points
EnergyPSMJ +0.2 points
IndustrialsPSMJ +0.1 points
UtilitiesPSMJ +0.1 points
Real EstatePSMJ +0.1 points
Consumer DiscretionaryPSMJ +0.1 points
MaterialsPSMJ +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GJUL and PSMJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in GJULMore in PSMJGap
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoGJUL +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GJUL103.1%
  • PSMJ102.9%

Securities held

  • GJUL2
  • PSMJ2

Asset class

GJUL
Multi-Asset
PSMJ
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in GJUL2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSMJ2

Only in GJUL

2 securities, 100% of GJUL by weight

  • 2027-07-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.4596.86%
  • 2027-07-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 743.315.41%

Only in PSMJ

2 securities, 100% of PSMJ by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 8.29 C96.80%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P5.42%

Weight gaps

GJUL and PSMJ share no securities.

All 4 GJUL holdings⁠All 6 PSMJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GJUL vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying GJUL vs PSMJ

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GJUL 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GJUL 0.85%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GJUL $16,199PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearGJULPSMJOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GJUL
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUL 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUL vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
GJUL No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GJUL None
PSMJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

GJULAll GJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021

GJUL vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GJUL 6.0%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GJUL 1.55, betterPSMJ 1.47
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GJUL −10.7%since Jul 2023PSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GJUL 0.48PSMJ 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • GJULCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJULCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJULCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.