Skip to content

GJUL vs PSMO

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July

GJULCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.36pt a year

GJUL0.85%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GJUL 3.6×the volume

GJUL29.5KPSMO8.14K

3Y return · a year

GJUL +1.8pt

GJUL+13.6%PSMO+11.8%

GJUL vs PSMO Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+9.1%GJUL+10.5%PSMO

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. GJUL +9.1%. PSMO +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GJUL 0.85%
PSMO 0.49%, better
Fund size
GJUL $403M
PSMO $117M
1Y total return
GJUL +9.1%
PSMO +10.5%, better
Holdings
GJUL 3
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
GJUL 29.5K sh, better
PSMO 8.14K sh
NAV per share
GJUL $43.78
PSMO $32.98
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GJUL: Cost 13, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 65, Durability 73. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 47, Mission 95, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for GJUL, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGJULPSMO
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC53HigherC47
Tradability15% weightA72HigherB66
Holdings10% weightB65Not scored
Durability5% weightA73HigherB66

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GJUL and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and GJUL 24th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 24CGFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 43
  4. Rank 24CGJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JulyScore 43
  5. Rank 24CGOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GJULCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

GJUL The July door into First Trust's moderate-buffer lineup: it aims to absorb the first 15% of an S&P 500 ETF price decline over a one-year outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap set when that period begins.

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

GJUL The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 13.82% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses during the July 20, 2026–July 16, 2027 target outcome period.

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • GJUL The first 15% of the reference ETF's price loss over each outcome period is absorbed by the option structure, not by a manager's judgment call.
  • Twelve month-stamped siblings run the same 15% recipe, so the calendar start is your choice. This one resets in July.
  • The reference is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, so the only moving parts are the buffer and the cap. No sector tilts, no stock picking.
  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • GJUL At 0.85%, it runs above the buffer-cohort median of 0.79%. Laddered peers like BUFF charge 0.10% and spread start dates for you.
  • Buffer and cap apply to the full outcome period. Buy or sell partway through and you own part of a buffer and part of a cap, priced by the options.
  • It targets price return, so S&P 500 dividends are not part of the package.
  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full GJUL profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

GJUL vs PSMO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GJUL vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying GJUL vs PSMO

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GJUL 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GJUL 0.85%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GJUL $16,199PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearGJULPSMOOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GJUL
  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUL 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUL vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
GJUL None
PSMO None

Distribution history

GJULAll GJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GJUL vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GJUL 6.0%PSMO 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GJUL 1.55, betterPSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GJUL −10.7%since Jul 2023PSMO −9.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GJUL 0.48PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • GJULCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJULCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJULCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.