PSMO ranks 1st and GJUL 24th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
GJUL vs PSMO
PSMO −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
GJUL 3.6×the volume
29.5K8.14K
GJUL +1.8pt
+13.6%+11.8%
GJUL vs PSMO Performance
+9.1%+10.5%
- GJUL 0.85%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- GJUL $403M
- PSMO $117M
- GJUL +9.1%
- PSMO +10.5%, better
- GJUL 3
- PSMO 3
- GJUL 29.5K sh, better
- PSMO 8.14K sh
- GJUL $43.78
- PSMO $32.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GJUL | PSMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C53Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | B66 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. GJUL and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GJULC
PSMOB
In short
GJUL The July door into First Trust's moderate-buffer lineup: it aims to absorb the first 15% of an S&P 500 ETF price decline over a one-year outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap set when that period begins.
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
Stated mandate
GJUL The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 13.82% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses during the July 20, 2026–July 16, 2027 target outcome period.
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GJUL vs PSMO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GJUL vs PSMO Cost
Overpaying GJUL vs PSMO
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GJUL 0.85%
$16,199
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GJUL | PSMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%GJUL
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
GJUL 37th cheapest of 51 funds
GJUL vs PSMO Dividends
- GJUL None
- PSMO None
Distribution history
GJUL vs PSMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GJUL 6.0%PSMO 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GJUL 1.55, betterPSMO 1.31
- Worst fall
- GJUL −10.7%PSMO −9.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GJUL 0.48PSMO 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.