BUFC ranks 4th and GJUL 24th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs GJUL
BUFC −0.16pt a year
0.69%0.85%
BUFC 1.6×the volume
48.2K29.5K
BUFC vs GJUL Performance
+5.9%+9.1%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- GJUL 0.85%
- BUFC $1.09B
- GJUL $403M
- BUFC +5.9%
- GJUL +9.1%, better
- BUFC 5
- GJUL 3
- BUFC 48.2K sh, better
- GJUL 29.5K sh
- BUFC $42.98
- GJUL $43.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | GJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | F13 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | A74Higher | A73 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and GJUL are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
GJULC
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
GJUL The July door into First Trust's moderate-buffer lineup: it aims to absorb the first 15% of an S&P 500 ETF price decline over a one-year outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap set when that period begins.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
GJUL The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 13.82% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses during the July 20, 2026–July 16, 2027 target outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs GJUL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs GJUL Cost
Overpaying GJUL vs BUFC
$2,770
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
GJUL 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | GJUL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,508 | $276 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,706 | $1,009 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $16,199 | $2,770 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.85%GJUL
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
GJUL 37th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs GJUL Dividends
- BUFC None
- GJUL None
Distribution history
BUFC vs GJUL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%GJUL 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82GJUL 1.55
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%GJUL −10.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26GJUL 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.