Skip to content

BUFC vs GJUL

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July

GJULCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.16pt a year

BUFC0.69%GJUL0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 1.6×the volume

BUFC48.2KGJUL29.5K

BUFC vs GJUL Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+5.9%BUFC+9.1%GJUL

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. BUFC +5.9%. GJUL +9.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%7.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
GJUL 0.85%
Fund size
BUFC $1.09B
GJUL $403M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.9%
GJUL +9.1%, better
Holdings
BUFC 5
GJUL 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 48.2K sh, better
GJUL 29.5K sh
NAV per share
BUFC $42.98
GJUL $43.78
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. GJUL: Cost 13, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 65, Durability 73.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, GJUL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCGJUL
Cost30% weightB57HigherF13
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC47C53Higher
Tradability15% weightB60A72Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB65
Durability5% weightA74HigherA73

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and GJUL are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and GJUL 24th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 5BPSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 24CGFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 43
  7. Rank 24CGJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JulyScore 43
  8. Rank 24CGOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

GJULCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

GJUL The July door into First Trust's moderate-buffer lineup: it aims to absorb the first 15% of an S&P 500 ETF price decline over a one-year outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap set when that period begins.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

GJUL The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 13.82% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses during the July 20, 2026–July 16, 2027 target outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • GJUL The first 15% of the reference ETF's price loss over each outcome period is absorbed by the option structure, not by a manager's judgment call.
  • Twelve month-stamped siblings run the same 15% recipe, so the calendar start is your choice. This one resets in July.
  • The reference is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, so the only moving parts are the buffer and the cap. No sector tilts, no stock picking.

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • GJUL At 0.85%, it runs above the buffer-cohort median of 0.79%. Laddered peers like BUFF charge 0.10% and spread start dates for you.
  • Buffer and cap apply to the full outcome period. Buy or sell partway through and you own part of a buffer and part of a cap, priced by the options.
  • It targets price return, so S&P 500 dividends are not part of the package.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full GJUL profile⁠

BUFC vs GJUL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs GJUL Cost

Overpaying GJUL vs BUFC

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • GJUL 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • GJUL 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GJUL $16,199BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCGJULOverpaying
10$1,232$1,508$276
20$4,697$5,706$1,009
30$13,429$16,199$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.85%GJUL
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUL 37th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs GJUL Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
GJUL None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GJULAll GJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs GJUL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024GJUL 6.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024GJUL 1.55
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023GJUL −10.7%since Jul 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26GJUL 0.48

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJULCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJULCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJULCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.