Skip to content

GJUN vs PSMR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

GJUNCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

PSMRBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMR −0.36pt a year

GJUN0.85%PSMR0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GJUN 60.5×the volume

GJUN76.4KPSMR1.26K

3Y return · a year

PSMR +0.1pt

GJUN+12.7%PSMR+12.8%

GJUN vs PSMR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.2%GJUN+12.1%PSMR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GJUN +7.2%. PSMR +12.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GJUN 0.85%
PSMR 0.49%, better
Fund size
GJUN $498M
PSMR $91M
1Y total return
GJUN +7.2%
PSMR +12.1%, better
Holdings
GJUN 3
PSMR 3
Avg volume (30D)
GJUN 76.4K sh, better
PSMR 1.26K sh
NAV per share
GJUN $41.92
PSMR $33.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GJUN: Cost 13, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings 65, Durability 81. PSMR: Cost 70, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for GJUN, PSMR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGJUNPSMR
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53B57Higher
Tradability15% weightA79HigherD32
Holdings10% weightB65Not scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherB64

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GJUN and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMR ranks 3rd and GJUN 19th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 16CPMARInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  6. Rank 19CGJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 45
  7. Rank 20CGAPRFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - AprilScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GJUNCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

PSMRBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

In short

GJUN Rebuilt every June: GJUN follows the price of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a preset cap while absorbing the first 15% of a decline. A cushion with a ceiling, on a fixed annual schedule.

PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.

Stated mandate

GJUN The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined upside cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.

PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • GJUN The 15% cushion is written into the fund's terms, not left to a manager's judgment: each June-to-June outcome period aims to absorb the reference ETF's first 15% of losses.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, so the thing being buffered is a fund whose price you can watch tick by tick.
  • June is one rung in First Trust's full twelve-month moderate-buffer series, so the reset month is a choice and laddering across months is straightforward.
  • PSMR Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median in its buffered-SPY cohort, and undercuts Pacer's own single-month siblings like PJUL and POCT at 0.79%.
  • The contract is spelled out: a 15-point buffer against SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over roughly a one-year period, with upside capped at a level set when the period begins.paceretfs.com
  • Terms reset on April 1 each year, so the new buffer and cap arrive on a known calendar date instead of whenever you happened to buy in.paceretfs.com
  • Running since 2021, so this April series has cycled through several complete outcome periods rather than being a fresh launch with a paper track record.

Worth knowing

  • GJUN At 0.85% a year it prices above the typical fund in its buffer cohort, a big reason it sits in the lower half of that peer group.
  • Cap and buffer are measured across a full outcome period. Step in mid-period and your remaining cushion and upside room differ from the headline terms.
  • The mandate targets price return, so payouts are not part of the design.
  • PSMR Thinly traded next to the biggest names in buffer land, so spreads and order size are worth a look before you place a trade.
  • The cap cuts both ways: big SPY years get trimmed, and the stated buffer and cap only line up in full for a holder who rides one April reset to the next.
  • Not an income vehicle. It has not been paying a regular distribution, so whatever the strategy delivers shows up in the share price.

Full GJUN profile⁠

Full PSMR profile⁠

GJUN vs PSMR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GJUN vs PSMR Cost

Overpaying GJUN vs PSMR

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GJUN 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMR 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GJUN 0.85%
  • PSMR 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GJUN $16,199PSMR $9,792

Year by year

YearGJUNPSMROverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GJUN
  • 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUN 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUN vs PSMR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GJUN None
PSMR None

Distribution history

GJUNAll GJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMRAll PSMR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GJUN vs PSMR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GJUN 5.7%, betterPSMR 6.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GJUN 1.36, betterPSMR 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GJUN −11.0%since Jun 2023PSMR −11.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GJUN 0.43PSMR 0.45

Popular comparisons

  • GJUNCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJUNCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJUNCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.