Skip to content

BUFC vs GJUN

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

GJUNCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.16pt a year

BUFC0.69%GJUN0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

GJUN 1.5×the volume

BUFC49.5KGJUN76.4K

BUFC vs GJUN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.8%BUFC+7.2%GJUN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BUFC +5.8%. GJUN +7.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%2%4%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
GJUN 0.85%
Fund size
BUFC $1.11B
GJUN $498M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.8%
GJUN +7.2%, better
Holdings
BUFC 4
GJUN 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh
GJUN 76.4K sh, better
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
GJUN $41.92
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. GJUN: Cost 13, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings 65, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, GJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCGJUN
Cost30% weightB57HigherF13
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41C53Higher
Tradability15% weightB62A79Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB65
Durability5% weightA74A81Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and GJUN are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and GJUN 19th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 16CPMARInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  7. Rank 19CGJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 45
  8. Rank 20CGAPRFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - AprilScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

GJUNCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

GJUN Rebuilt every June: GJUN follows the price of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a preset cap while absorbing the first 15% of a decline. A cushion with a ceiling, on a fixed annual schedule.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

GJUN The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined upside cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • GJUN The 15% cushion is written into the fund's terms, not left to a manager's judgment: each June-to-June outcome period aims to absorb the reference ETF's first 15% of losses.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, so the thing being buffered is a fund whose price you can watch tick by tick.
  • June is one rung in First Trust's full twelve-month moderate-buffer series, so the reset month is a choice and laddering across months is straightforward.

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • GJUN At 0.85% a year it prices above the typical fund in its buffer cohort, a big reason it sits in the lower half of that peer group.
  • Cap and buffer are measured across a full outcome period. Step in mid-period and your remaining cushion and upside room differ from the headline terms.
  • The mandate targets price return, so payouts are not part of the design.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full GJUN profile⁠

BUFC vs GJUN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs GJUN Cost

Overpaying GJUN vs BUFC

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • GJUN 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • GJUN 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GJUN $16,199BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCGJUNOverpaying
10$1,232$1,508$276
20$4,697$5,706$1,009
30$13,429$16,199$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.85%GJUN
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUN 37th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs GJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
GJUN None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GJUNAll GJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs GJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024GJUN 5.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024GJUN 1.36
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023GJUN −11.0%since Jun 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26GJUN 0.43

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJUNCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJUNCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJUNCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.