PSMJ ranks 2nd and GJUN 19th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
GJUN vs PSMJ
0.0%by weight
PSMJ −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
GJUN 11.5×the volume
76.4K6.64K
PSMJ +1.7pt
+12.7%+14.4%
GJUN vs PSMJ Performance
+7.2%+8.2%
- GJUN 0.85%
- PSMJ 0.49%, better
- GJUN $498M
- PSMJ $108M
- GJUN +7.2%
- PSMJ +8.2%, better
- GJUN
- PSMJ 0.00%
- GJUN 3
- PSMJ 3
- GJUN 76.4K sh, better
- PSMJ 6.64K sh
- GJUN $41.92
- PSMJ $34.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GJUN | PSMJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C53Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | B63 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. GJUN and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GJUNC
PSMJB
In short
GJUN Rebuilt every June: GJUN follows the price of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a preset cap while absorbing the first 15% of a decline. A cushion with a ceiling, on a fixed annual schedule.
PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.
Stated mandate
GJUN The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined upside cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.
PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GJUN vs PSMJ Holdings
How GJUN and PSMJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GJUN and 0.0% of PSMJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in GJUNMore in PSMJ | GJUN | PSMJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in GJUNMore in PSMJ | GJUN | PSMJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- GJUN102.7%
- PSMJ103.2%
- GJUN2
- PSMJ2
Asset class
- GJUN
- Multi-Asset
- PSMJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in GJUN2
- In both0
- Only in PSMJ2
Only in GJUN
2 securities, 100% of GJUN by weight
- 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.4997.92%
- 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 746.763.87%
Only in PSMJ
2 securities, 100% of PSMJ by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 8.29 C99.24%
- Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P3.28%
Weight gaps
GJUN and PSMJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GJUN vs PSMJ Cost
Overpaying GJUN vs PSMJ
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GJUN 0.85%
$16,199
PSMJ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GJUN | PSMJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%GJUN
- 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds
GJUN 37th cheapest of 51 funds
GJUN vs PSMJ Dividends
- GJUN
- PSMJ 0.00%
- GJUN None
- PSMJ None
Distribution history
GJUN vs PSMJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GJUN 5.7%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GJUN 1.36PSMJ 1.47, better
- Worst fall
- GJUN −11.0%PSMJ −10.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GJUN 0.43PSMJ 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.