Skip to content

GJUN vs PSMJ

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

GJUNCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.36pt a year

GJUN0.85%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GJUN 11.5×the volume

GJUN76.4KPSMJ6.64K

3Y return · a year

PSMJ +1.7pt

GJUN+12.7%PSMJ+14.4%

GJUN vs PSMJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.2%GJUN+8.2%PSMJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GJUN +7.2%. PSMJ +8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%2%4%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GJUN 0.85%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
GJUN $498M
PSMJ $108M
1Y total return
GJUN +7.2%
PSMJ +8.2%, better
Yield (12M)
GJUN No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
GJUN 3
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
GJUN 76.4K sh, better
PSMJ 6.64K sh
NAV per share
GJUN $41.92
PSMJ $34.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GJUN: Cost 13, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings 65, Durability 81. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for GJUN, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGJUNPSMJ
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53HigherC46
Tradability15% weightA79HigherC50
Holdings10% weightB65Not scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherB63

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GJUN and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and GJUN 19th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 16CPMARInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  5. Rank 19CGJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 45
  6. Rank 20CGAPRFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - AprilScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GJUNCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

GJUN Rebuilt every June: GJUN follows the price of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a preset cap while absorbing the first 15% of a decline. A cushion with a ceiling, on a fixed annual schedule.

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

GJUN The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined upside cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • GJUN The 15% cushion is written into the fund's terms, not left to a manager's judgment: each June-to-June outcome period aims to absorb the reference ETF's first 15% of losses.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, so the thing being buffered is a fund whose price you can watch tick by tick.
  • June is one rung in First Trust's full twelve-month moderate-buffer series, so the reset month is a choice and laddering across months is straightforward.
  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • GJUN At 0.85% a year it prices above the typical fund in its buffer cohort, a big reason it sits in the lower half of that peer group.
  • Cap and buffer are measured across a full outcome period. Step in mid-period and your remaining cushion and upside room differ from the headline terms.
  • The mandate targets price return, so payouts are not part of the design.
  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full GJUN profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

GJUN vs PSMJ Holdings

As of

How GJUN and PSMJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GJUN and 0.0% of PSMJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in GJUN and PSMJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in GJUNMore in PSMJ
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GJUN and PSMJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in GJUNMore in PSMJ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GJUN102.7%
  • PSMJ103.2%

Securities held

  • GJUN2
  • PSMJ2

Asset class

GJUN
Multi-Asset
PSMJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GJUN2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSMJ2

Only in GJUN

2 securities, 100% of GJUN by weight

  • 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.4997.92%
  • 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 746.763.87%

Only in PSMJ

2 securities, 100% of PSMJ by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 8.29 C99.24%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P3.28%

Weight gaps

GJUN and PSMJ share no securities.

All 4 GJUN holdings⁠All 6 PSMJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GJUN vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying GJUN vs PSMJ

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GJUN 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GJUN 0.85%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GJUN $16,199PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearGJUNPSMJOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GJUN
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUN 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUN vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GJUN No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GJUN None
PSMJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

GJUNAll GJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021

GJUN vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GJUN 5.7%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GJUN 1.36PSMJ 1.47, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GJUN −11.0%since Jun 2023PSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GJUN 0.43PSMJ 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • GJUNCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJUNCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GJUNCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.