Skip to content

GLD vs GLDM

SPDR Gold Shares

GLDBNYSE Arca

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

GLDMANYSE Arca

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Expense ratio

GLDM −0.30pt a year

GLD 0.40%GLDM 0.10%

Avg volume · 30D

GLD 2.0×the volume

GLD 8.9MGLDM 4.52M

5Y return · a year

GLDM +0.4pt

GLD +17.9%GLDM +18.3%

GLD vs GLDM Performance

Oct 13, 2025 – Oct 13, 2026

+0.9%GLD+1.2%GLDM

Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. GLD +0.9%. GLDM +1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GLD 0.40%
GLDM 0.10%, better
Fund size
GLD $141B
GLDM $31B
1Y total return
GLD +0.9%
GLDM +1.2%, better
Holdings
GLD 1
GLDM 1
Avg volume (30D)
GLD 8.9M sh, better
GLDM 4.52M sh
NAV per share
GLD $382.42
GLDM $82.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GLD: Cost 12, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 78, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. GLDM: Cost 91, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 71, Holdings not scored, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for GLD, GLDM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGLDGLDM
Cost30% weightF12A91Higher
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC49C49
Tradability15% weightA78HigherA71
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA82HigherB67

Rank among Physical Gold funds

Same Category. GLD and GLDM are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Gold⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

GLDM ranks 1st and GLD 9th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.

  1. Rank 1AGLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares TrustScore 81
  2. Rank 2AIAUMiShares Gold Trust MicroScore 77
  3. Rank 7BOUNZVanEck Merk Gold ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 9BGLDSPDR Gold SharesScore 57
  5. Rank 10CYSAUY all Street Physical Gold ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GLDBSPDR Gold Shares

GLDMASPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

In short

GLD Gold in a brokerage account, running since 2004: a trust that holds physical bullion and trades like a stock. It's the heavyweight of the gold shelf, and the fee is the price of that depth.

GLDM The house that built the original gold ETF later built a cheaper one. GLDM holds physical gold bullion, charges 0.10% a year (a quarter of its older sibling's fee), and has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund.

Stated mandate

GLD GLD seeks to have its shares track the price of gold bullion after the Trust’s operating expenses.

GLDM GLDM seeks to reflect the performance of gold bullion, less the fund's expenses.

Why people hold it

  • GLD Does the one job it advertises: shares track the price of gold bullion after the trust's expenses, and the tracking is among the tightest in the gold group.
  • Huge and very actively traded, which is why spreads tend to be thin and large orders usually find the other side quickly.
  • Plain structure: a grantor trust holding physical gold. No futures, no roll schedule, no leverage between you and the metal.
  • Trading since 2004, one of the longest-running gold vehicles on the US market and through several gold cycles.
  • GLDM Ten basis points a year for bullion exposure, below the typical fee among physical gold funds and a quarter of the 0.40% on GLD, the sponsor's original gold trust.
  • Simple plumbing: a grantor trust that holds metal and seeks to reflect gold bullion less expenses. No futures roll, no swap counterparty, no miner-stock beta in the way.
  • One of the strongest implementations in its peer group, and among the more actively traded gold funds, which tends to keep the spread you pay getting in and out modest.
  • Launched in 2018 as the low-fee sibling to the 2004 original, it is now a large, established trust rather than a niche launch hoping to find an audience.

Worth knowing

  • GLD 0.40% a year is the toll for that liquidity: more than double the typical physical-gold ETF fee, and above its own cheaper sibling GLDM at 0.10%.
  • No dividends or interest. Bullion pays nothing, so the gold price minus the trust's expenses is the entire story.
  • Gold moves in big swings, with no earnings or yield underneath to soften them.
  • GLDM Gold pays nothing. No dividends, no interest, and the trust covers its expenses out of the metal, so gold per share drifts down over time.
  • One metal, one price. This is undiversified exposure to bullion, and gold can swing hard in both directions.
  • A couple of rivals list lower headline fees (IAUM at 0.09%, FGDL at 0.00%) for similar physical gold exposure.

Full GLD profile⁠

Full GLDM profile⁠

GLD vs GLDM Holdings

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Only GLD
0
of 1
In both
1
holdings
Only GLDM
0
of 1

Holdings side by side

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingGLDGLDM
Physical GoldPhysical Gold100.00%100.00%

All GLD holdings⁠All GLDM holdings⁠

GLD vs GLDM Cost

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%GLD
  • 0.10%GLDM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Gold funds
  • Median 0.17%

1 of 10 Physical Gold funds charges less than GLDM

9 of 10 charge less than GLD

$5,984less in fees with GLDM over 30 years, on $10,000 invested

$0$2,000$4,000$6,000$8,000$10,000Start10 years20 years30 years

Assumes $10,000 invested once and 7% growth a year before fees.

GLD vs GLDM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 13, 2026
Payout (12M)
GLD: None
GLDM: None

Distribution history

GLDAll GLD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GLDMAll GLDM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GLD vs GLDM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GLD
  • GLDM
Oct 13, 2021 to Oct 13, 2026. Worst fall: GLD −26.4% · Jul 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GLD 19.0%GLDM 18.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GLD 1.28GLDM 1.29, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GLD −26.4%GLDM −26.3%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 3 years
GLD 0.44GLDM 0.41

GLD and GLDM in the news

Popular comparisons