Skip to content

GLDM vs IAUM

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

GLDMANYSE Arca

iShares Gold Trust Micro

IAUMANYSE Arca

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Expense ratio

IAUM −0.01pt a year

GLDM 0.10%IAUM 0.09%

Avg volume · 30D

GLDM 1.8×the volume

GLDM 4.52MIAUM 2.58M

5Y return · a year

=

GLDM +18.3%IAUM +18.3%

GLDM vs IAUM Performance

Oct 13, 2025 – Oct 13, 2026

+1.2%GLDM+1.3%IAUM

Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. GLDM +1.2%. IAUM +1.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GLDM 0.10%
IAUM 0.09%, better
Fund size
GLDM $31B
IAUM $8.01B
1Y total return
GLDM +1.2%
IAUM +1.3%, better
Holdings
GLDM 1
IAUM 1
Avg volume (30D)
GLDM 4.52M sh, better
IAUM 2.58M sh
NAV per share
GLDM $82.52
IAUM $41.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GLDM: Cost 91, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 71, Holdings not scored, Durability 67. IAUM: Cost 91, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 47, Holdings not scored, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for GLDM, IAUM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGLDMIAUM
Cost30% weightA91A91
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC49C49
Tradability15% weightA71HigherC47
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB67HigherB60

Rank among Physical Gold funds

Same Category. GLDM and IAUM are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Gold⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

GLDM ranks 1st and IAUM 2nd of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.

  1. Rank 1AGLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares TrustScore 81
  2. Rank 2AIAUMiShares Gold Trust MicroScore 77
  3. Rank 3BFGDLFranklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETFScore 67

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GLDMASPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

IAUMAiShares Gold Trust Micro

In short

GLDM The house that built the original gold ETF later built a cheaper one. GLDM holds physical gold bullion, charges 0.10% a year (a quarter of its older sibling's fee), and has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund.

IAUM Bullion in a vault, at 0.09% a year, roughly half the typical fee among physical gold funds. This is iShares' small-fee take on owning metal, priced off the LBMA Gold Price benchmark.

Stated mandate

GLDM GLDM seeks to reflect the performance of gold bullion, less the fund's expenses.

IAUM The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of gold, before its expenses and liabilities, by holding physical gold.

Why people hold it

  • GLDM Ten basis points a year for bullion exposure, below the typical fee among physical gold funds and a quarter of the 0.40% on GLD, the sponsor's original gold trust.
  • Simple plumbing: a grantor trust that holds metal and seeks to reflect gold bullion less expenses. No futures roll, no swap counterparty, no miner-stock beta in the way.
  • One of the strongest implementations in its peer group, and among the more actively traded gold funds, which tends to keep the spread you pay getting in and out modest.
  • Launched in 2018 as the low-fee sibling to the 2004 original, it is now a large, established trust rather than a niche launch hoping to find an audience.
  • IAUM Fee is 0.09% a year against a 0.17% median for physical gold peers, a hair under GLDM (0.10%) and well under SGOL (0.17%) and AAAU (0.18%).
  • Plain plumbing: a grantor trust that holds physical gold and seeks to reflect gold's performance, before expenses and liabilities, against the LBMA Gold Price.ishares.com
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and it tracks its gold benchmark about as closely as anything in the physical gold group.

Worth knowing

  • GLDM Gold pays nothing. No dividends, no interest, and the trust covers its expenses out of the metal, so gold per share drifts down over time.
  • One metal, one price. This is undiversified exposure to bullion, and gold can swing hard in both directions.
  • A couple of rivals list lower headline fees (IAUM at 0.09%, FGDL at 0.00%) for similar physical gold exposure.
  • IAUM No income here. The trust has made no distributions, so return is gold's price move minus the fee, nothing else.
  • Gold swings hard on sentiment and rates, and there is no yield to cushion a drawdown.
  • Launched in 2021, it is younger than the bullion trusts that anchor this category and not the deepest-traded name among them.

Full GLDM profile⁠

Full IAUM profile⁠

GLDM vs IAUM Holdings

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Only GLDM
0
of 1
In both
1
holdings
Only IAUM
0
of 1

Holdings side by side

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingGLDMIAUM
Physical GoldPhysical Gold100.00%100.00%

All GLDM holdings⁠All IAUM holdings⁠

GLDM vs IAUM Cost

Expense ratio

  • 0.10%GLDM
  • 0.09%IAUM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Gold funds
  • Median 0.17%

0 of 10 Physical Gold funds charge less than IAUM

1 of 10 charges less than GLDM

$208less in fees with IAUM over 30 years, on $10,000 invested

$0$500$1,000$1,500$2,000$2,500Start10 years20 years30 years

Assumes $10,000 invested once and 7% growth a year before fees.

GLDM vs IAUM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 13, 2026
Payout (12M)
GLDM: None
IAUM: None

Distribution history

GLDMAll GLDM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IAUMAll IAUM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GLDM vs IAUM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GLDM
  • IAUM
Oct 13, 2021 to Oct 13, 2026. Worst fall: IAUM −26.3% · Jul 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GLDM 18.9%, betterIAUM 19.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GLDM 1.29IAUM 1.29=
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GLDM −26.3%IAUM −26.3%=
Market sensitivityBeta, 3 years
GLDM 0.41IAUM 0.41=

GLDM and IAUM in the news

Popular comparisons