Skip to content

IAUM vs SGOL

iShares Gold Trust Micro

IAUMANYSE Arca

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

SGOLBNYSE Arca

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Expense ratio

IAUM −0.08pt a year

IAUM 0.09%SGOL 0.17%

Avg volume · 30D

IAUM 1.02×the volume

IAUM 2.58MSGOL 2.52M

5Y return · a year

IAUM +0.1pt

IAUM +18.3%SGOL +18.2%

IAUM vs SGOL Performance

Oct 13, 2025 – Oct 13, 2026

+1.3%IAUM+1.1%SGOL

Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. IAUM +1.3%. SGOL +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IAUM 0.09%, better
SGOL 0.17%
Fund size
IAUM $8.01B
SGOL $7.18B
1Y total return
IAUM +1.3%, better
SGOL +1.1%
Holdings
IAUM 1
SGOL 1
Avg volume (30D)
IAUM 2.58M sh, better
SGOL 2.52M sh
NAV per share
IAUM $41.54
SGOL $39.84
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IAUM: Cost 91, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 47, Holdings not scored, Durability 60. SGOL: Cost 59, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 43, Holdings not scored, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for IAUM, SGOL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIAUMSGOL
Cost30% weightA91HigherB59
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC49C49
Tradability15% weightC47HigherC43
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB60B62Higher

Rank among Physical Gold funds

Same Category. IAUM and SGOL are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Gold⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

IAUM ranks 2nd and SGOL 4th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.

  1. Rank 1AGLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares TrustScore 81
  2. Rank 2AIAUMiShares Gold Trust MicroScore 77
  3. Rank 3BFGDLFranklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETFScore 67
  4. Rank 4BSGOLabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 5BAAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETFScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IAUMAiShares Gold Trust Micro

SGOLBabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

In short

IAUM Bullion in a vault, at 0.09% a year, roughly half the typical fee among physical gold funds. This is iShares' small-fee take on owning metal, priced off the LBMA Gold Price benchmark.

SGOL A 2009-vintage trust that owns actual gold bars and does exactly one job: track bullion's price after a 0.17% fee. Middle of the pack on cost, front of the pack on doing what the prospectus says.

Stated mandate

IAUM The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of gold, before its expenses and liabilities, by holding physical gold.

SGOL The Trust seeks to track the price of physical gold bullion, after deducting its expenses.

Why people hold it

  • IAUM Fee is 0.09% a year against a 0.17% median for physical gold peers, a hair under GLDM (0.10%) and well under SGOL (0.17%) and AAAU (0.18%).
  • Plain plumbing: a grantor trust that holds physical gold and seeks to reflect gold's performance, before expenses and liabilities, against the LBMA Gold Price.ishares.com
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and it tracks its gold benchmark about as closely as anything in the physical gold group.
  • SGOL Plain plumbing: a grantor trust holding physical bullion, with one job written into its own documents, to track the price of gold after deducting expenses.
  • Tracks the metal about as closely as the wrapper allows, one of the cleanest mandate implementations among physical gold funds.
  • Trading since 2009, through several full gold cycles, and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that changes hands actively.

Worth knowing

  • IAUM No income here. The trust has made no distributions, so return is gold's price move minus the fee, nothing else.
  • Gold swings hard on sentiment and rates, and there is no yield to cushion a drawdown.
  • Launched in 2021, it is younger than the bullion trusts that anchor this category and not the deepest-traded name among them.
  • SGOL Cost sits at the category median: 0.17% a year, while IAUM (0.09%) and GLDM (0.10%) charge less to hold the same metal.
  • Bullion throws off no income. This is a price-of-gold holding, not a cash-flow one, and the fee comes out of trust assets.
  • One metal, no diversification. The shares go where gold goes, including the long flat stretches and sharp drawdowns.

Full IAUM profile⁠

Full SGOL profile⁠

IAUM vs SGOL Holdings

Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Only IAUM
0
of 1
In both
1
holdings
Only SGOL
0
of 1

Holdings side by side

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingIAUMSGOL
Physical GoldPhysical Gold100.00%100.00%

All IAUM holdings⁠All SGOL holdings⁠

IAUM vs SGOL Cost

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%IAUM, cheaper
  • 0.17%SGOL
  • Middle half of Physical Gold funds
  • Median 0.17%

0 of 10 Physical Gold funds charge less than IAUM

3 of 10 charge less than SGOL

$1,648less in fees with IAUM over 30 years, on $10,000 invested

$0$1,000$2,000$3,000$4,000Start10 years20 years30 years

Assumes $10,000 invested once and 7% growth a year before fees.

IAUM vs SGOL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 13, 2026
Payout (12M)
IAUM: None
SGOL: None

Distribution history

IAUMAll IAUM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SGOLAll SGOL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IAUM vs SGOL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IAUM
  • SGOL
Oct 13, 2021 to Oct 13, 2026. Worst fall: SGOL −26.3% · Jul 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IAUM 19.0%SGOL 18.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IAUM 1.29SGOL 1.29=
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IAUM −26.3%SGOL −26.3%=
Market sensitivityBeta, 3 years
IAUM 0.41SGOL 0.40

IAUM and SGOL in the news

Popular comparisons