GMOD ranks 2nd and HIDE 14th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GMOD vs HIDE
HIDE −0.21pt a year
0.50%0.29%
HIDE 3.0×the volume
11.8K35.4K
GMOD vs HIDE Performance
+11.8%+8.1%
- GMOD 0.50%
- HIDE 0.29%, better
- GMOD $49M
- HIDE $140M
- GMOD +11.8%, better
- HIDE +8.1%
- GMOD
- HIDE 2.95%
- GMOD 20
- HIDE 3
- GMOD 11.8K sh
- HIDE 35.4K sh, better
- GMOD $27.77
- HIDE $24.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOD | HIDE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A74Higher | F18 |
| Risk | A75Higher | B68 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | A70 |
| Holdings | B64Higher | F13 |
| Durability | C49 | A80Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GMOD and HIDE are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMODA
HIDEB
In short
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
HIDE Three asset classes, one trend model: Treasuries for deflation, real estate and commodities for inflation, cash when nothing works. Fee is 0.29% net of a waiver through February 1, 2027, below the typical tactical multi-asset fund.
Stated mandate
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
HIDE The Fund seeks long-term total return through a systematic, actively adjusted allocation among intermediate-term U.S. Treasury bonds, real estate, commodities, and cash or cash equivalents.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOD vs HIDE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOD vs HIDE Cost
Overpaying GMOD vs HIDE
$4,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
HIDE 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOD | HIDE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $527 | $373 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,044 | $1,416 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $5,952 | $4,027 |
- 0.50%GMOD
- 0.29%HIDE, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
HIDE 3rd cheapest of 46 funds
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
GMOD vs HIDE Dividends
- GMOD
- HIDE 2.95%
- GMOD
- HIDE $0.72
- GMOD $0.14
- HIDE $0.72
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- HIDE Dec 23, 2025
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- HIDE Dec 24, 2025
- GMOD Twice a year
- HIDE Annual
Distribution history
GMOD vs HIDE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOD 8.7%HIDE 4.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOD 0.89HIDE −0.06
- Worst fall
- GMOD −6.5%HIDE −5.1%
- Market sensitivity
- GMOD 0.48HIDE 0.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.