Skip to content

GNR vs PWER

State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF

GNRANYSE Arca

Nomura Energy Transition ETF

PWERFNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GNR −0.39pt a year

GNR0.40%PWER0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

GNR 354.4×the volume

GNR341KPWER962

GNR vs PWER Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+31.9%GNR+31.8%PWER

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GNR +31.9%. PWER +31.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GNR 0.40%, better
PWER 0.79%
Fund size
GNR $5.39B
PWER $12M
1Y total return
GNR +31.9%, better
PWER +31.8%
Yield (12M)
GNR 2.42%, better
PWER 1.13%
Holdings
GNR 110
PWER 40
Avg volume (30D)
GNR 341K sh, better
PWER 962 sh
NAV per share
GNR $75.69
PWER $43.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GNR: Cost 80, Risk 54, Mission 76, Tradability 83, Holdings 77, Durability 89. PWER: Cost 1, Risk 28, Mission not scored, Tradability 8, Holdings 65, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for GNR, PWER, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGNRPWER
Cost30% weightA80HigherF1
Mission25% weightA76Not scored
Risk15% weightC54HigherD28
Tradability15% weightA83HigherF8
Holdings10% weightA77HigherB65
Durability5% weightA89HigherD33

Rank among Natural Resources funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GNR and PWER are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Natural Resources⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

GNR ranks 2nd and PWER 13th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.

  1. Rank 1AIGEiShares North American Natural Resources ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AGNRState Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETFScore 75
  3. Rank 2ANANRState Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 12DFTRIFirst Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETFScore 28
  5. Rank 13FPWERNomura Energy Transition ETFScore 18
  6. MLPINot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GNRAState Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF

PWERFNomura Energy Transition ETF

In short

GNR Most resource ETFs are energy funds in a hard hat. GNR spreads a global, large-cap lineup across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining, roughly 90 names tracking an S&P natural resources index since 2010.

PWER A clean-energy fund that owns the gritty stuff on purpose: Nomura's manager pairs transition enablers with "responsible producers" (traditional energy and materials firms cutting emissions). Active, no index, 0.79% with no fee waiver.

Stated mandate

GNR The fund seeks to provide investment results corresponding generally to the total return performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It provides exposure to large-cap companies across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining.

PWER The Fund seeks long-term capital growth through an actively managed portfolio of companies supporting the transition to cleaner, lower-carbon energy. It emphasizes transition enablers and responsible producers selected through environmental and fundamental analysis.

Why people hold it

  • GNR Three legs, one ticker: crop and fertilizer names, oil and gas, and miners all sit inside the mandate, so no single commodity story runs the whole fund.ssga.com
  • Genuinely global, not North America with a passport. Cohort neighbors IGE and NANR chase the same theme inside one region.
  • 0.40% a year, right around the middle of its natural resources peer group, for an index fund that has been open since 2010.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund with steady day-to-day trading and one of the stronger builds in its natural resources peer group.
  • PWER Big tent. Alongside electrification and renewables names it can hold traditional energy and materials producers that pure clean-energy screens typically exclude, if they are cutting, displacing or sequestering emissions.sec.gov
  • No index to hug. The manager selects across energy, materials, industrials, renewables and utilities using environmental and fundamental analysis, and can reshuffle as the transition story changes.sec.gov
  • Global reach with a North American center of gravity, and a prospectus rule that at least 80% of assets meet its stated energy-transition criteria.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • GNR Resource equities ride the commodity cycle. When crude and metals roll over, the drillers and miners in here go with them, diversified thirds or not.
  • Global reach means overseas listings and foreign currency swings layered on top of the commodity moves.
  • Distributions land on an annual or semiannual schedule rather than monthly, so the cash flow is lumpy.
  • PWER Costs 0.79% with no fee waiver, above the category median. Index-built resource funds such as NANR (0.35%) and IGE (0.37%) deliver the broad version far cheaper.
  • Small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider and fills lumpier than in the category's heavyweights.
  • Everything rides on one team's judgment of who qualifies as a transition enabler, and the fund has only traded since 2023, a short track record to read.sec.gov

Full GNR profile⁠

Full PWER profile⁠

GNR vs PWER Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GNR vs PWER Cost

Overpaying PWER vs GNR

$7,084

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GNR 0.40%

    $8,090

  • PWER 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GNR 0.40%
  • PWER 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PWER $15,174GNR $8,090

Year by year

YearGNRPWEROverpaying
10$723$1,405$682
20$2,793$5,331$2,538
30$8,090$15,174$7,084

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%GNR, cheaper
  • 0.79%PWER
  • Middle half of Natural Resources funds
  • Median 0.46%

GNR 4th cheapest of 14 funds

PWER 14th cheapest of 14 funds

GNR vs PWER Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GNR 2.42%, better
PWER 1.13%
Payout (12M)
GNR $1.82
PWER $0.49
Last payment
GNR $0.86
PWER $0.23
Ex-dividend
GNR Jun 1, 2026
PWER Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
GNR Jun 3, 2026
PWER Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
GNR Twice a year
PWER Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GNRTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll GNR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.54; Dec 15, 2017 $0.64; Jun 1, 2018 $0.61; Dec 21, 2018 $0.84; Jun 3, 2019 $0.81; Dec 20, 2019 $0.96; Jun 1, 2020 $0.48; Dec 18, 2020 $0.76; Jun 1, 2021 $0.69; Dec 17, 2021 $1.16; Jun 1, 2022 $1.17; Dec 16, 2022 $1.33; Jun 1, 2023 $0.93; Dec 15, 2023 $0.98; Jun 3, 2024 $0.99; Dec 18, 2024 $1.37; Jun 2, 2025 $0.76; Dec 18, 2025 $0.96; Jun 1, 2026 $0.86. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
PWERQuarterly · 10 paymentsAll PWER payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2023 $0.02; Mar 18, 2024 $0.03; Jun 24, 2024 $0.06; Sep 23, 2024 $0.07; Dec 23, 2024 $0.12; Jun 24, 2025 $0.21; Sep 23, 2025 $0.07; Dec 24, 2025 $0.20; Jun 22, 2026 $0.06; Sep 21, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

GNR vs PWER Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GNR 15.9%PWER 20.4%since Dec 2023
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GNR 0.75PWER 0.85since Dec 2023
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GNR −25.7%PWER −29.7%since Nov 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GNR 0.48PWER 0.88

Popular comparisons

  • GNRAvsIGEA

    State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF · iShares North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PWERFvsIGEA

    Nomura Energy Transition ETF · iShares North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GNRAvsNANRA

    State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF · State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PWERFvsNANRA

    Nomura Energy Transition ETF · State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GNRAvsHAPA

    State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF · VanEck Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.41%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PWERFvsHAPA

    Nomura Energy Transition ETF · VanEck Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.41%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.