Skip to content

GUSE vs LRGE

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETF

LRGEBNasdaq

Overlap

31.6%by weight

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.18pt a year

GUSE0.30%LRGE0.48%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 1.6×the volume

GUSE24.9KLRGE15.2K

GUSE vs LRGE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GUSE+3.5%LRGE

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GUSE +11.8%. LRGE +3.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
LRGE 0.48%
Fund size
GUSE $421M
LRGE $364M
1Y total return
GUSE No data
LRGE −0.7%
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
LRGE 0.12%
Holdings
GUSE 122
LRGE 32
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
LRGE 15.2K sh
NAV per share
GUSE $46.05
LRGE $85.28
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. LRGE: Cost 69, Risk 56, Mission 79, Tradability 81, Holdings 43, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, LRGE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSELRGE
Cost30% weightA97HigherB69
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightA94HigherB56
Tradability15% weightC46A81Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherC43
Durability5% weightA85HigherA79

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and LRGE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and LRGE 16th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 13BVUSGVanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 16BLRGEClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETFScore 65
  6. Rank 16BNSIGNorth Square Growth Opportunities ETFScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

LRGEBClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

LRGE One of the earlier active large-cap growth ETFs (2017), ClearBridge runs a tight book of roughly 30 names instead of a lightly tweaked index. Priced below the typical active growth fund, with the concentration that real conviction implies.

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

LRGE The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in large-capitalization companies.

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • LRGE Roughly 30 stocks, so every name carries weight. This is a stock-picker's portfolio, not an index wearing an active label.
  • 0.48% a year, under the median for its active US large-cap growth peer group.
  • Live since 2017, well before the active-ETF land rush, and it has stayed tightly aligned with its stated large-cap growth mandate.
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in a crowded field of high-conviction US growth funds.

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.
  • LRGE Volume is light next to the category's household names, so spreads can run wider and large orders need more care.
  • Cheap for active, not cheap outright: index-plus peers such as JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%) charge a fraction of the fee.
  • A book this concentrated moves differently from a broad growth index. One stumble in a top position shows up clearly.

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full LRGE profile⁠

GUSE vs LRGE Holdings

How GUSE and LRGE differ

Overlap by weight

31.6%

Shared holdings make up 75.8% of LRGE and 31.9% of GUSE.

Level by level

  • Holdings19 in both31.6%
  • Countryby domicile94.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for GUSE.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GUSE and LRGE, widest gap first
CountryMore in GUSEMore in LRGE
United StatesGUSE +5.0 points
NetherlandsLRGE +3.0 points
TaiwanLRGE +2.5 points
United KingdomGUSE +0.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GUSE34.6%
  • LRGE60.1%

Securities held

  • GUSE121
  • LRGE31

Asset class

GUSE
Equity
LRGE
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GUSE102
  • In both19
  • Only in LRGE12

Only in GUSE

102 securities, 66.3% of GUSE by weight

  • Microsoft Corporation4.97%
  • Broadcom Inc.2.39%
  • Eli Lilly & Co2.00%

Only in LRGE

12 securities, 23.6% of LRGE by weight

  • Asml Holding Nv-Ny Reg Shs2.99%
  • Intuitive Surgical Inc2.37%
  • Airbnb Inc-Class A2.36%

Weight gaps

All 19 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GUSE and LRGE, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GUSEMore in LRGE
NVIDIA CorporationNVDALRGE +8.68 points
Palo Alto Networks Inc.PANWLRGE +4.52 points
Meta Platforms Inc-Class AMETALRGE +4.37 points
Visa Inc.VLRGE +3.98 points
Alphabet Inc.GOOGLLRGE +2.85 points
Arista Networks, Inc.ANETLRGE +2.77 points
Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg Ads-AdrTSMLRGE +2.44 points
Tesla Inc.TSLALRGE +2.29 points

All 121 GUSE holdings⁠All 32 LRGE holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs LRGE Cost

Overpaying LRGE vs GUSE

$3,456

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • LRGE 0.48%

    $9,605

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • LRGE 0.48%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530LRGE $9,605GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSELRGEOverpaying
10$545$865$320
20$2,113$3,328$1,215
30$6,149$9,605$3,456

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.48%LRGE
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

LRGE 29th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs LRGE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
LRGE 0.12%
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
LRGE $0.10
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
LRGE $0.10
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
LRGE Dec 26, 2025
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
LRGE Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
LRGE Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
LRGEAnnual · 9 paymentsAll LRGE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.11; Dec 26, 2019 $0.14; Dec 28, 2020 $0.18; Dec 27, 2021 $0.73; Jun 27, 2022 $0.0017; Dec 27, 2022 $0.82; Dec 26, 2023 $0.06; Dec 26, 2024 $0.13; Dec 26, 2025 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

GUSE vs LRGE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataLRGE 15.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataLRGE 0.88
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataLRGE −37.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.93LRGE 1.14

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGEBvsJUSAA

    ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGEBvsLRGCA

    ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGEBvsFELGA

    ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.