JUSA ranks 1st and LRGE 16th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs LRGE
JUSA −0.30pt a year
0.18%0.48%
JUSA 6.5×the volume
98.8K15.2K
JUSA vs LRGE Performance
+10.8%−0.7%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- LRGE 0.48%
- JUSA $745M
- LRGE $364M
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- LRGE −0.7%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- LRGE 0.12%
- JUSA 263
- LRGE 32
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- LRGE 15.2K sh
- JUSA $67.75
- LRGE $85.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | LRGE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B69 |
| Mission | A84Higher | A79 |
| Risk | A92Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | B58 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | C43 |
| Durability | A76 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and LRGE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
LRGEB
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
LRGE One of the earlier active large-cap growth ETFs (2017), ClearBridge runs a tight book of roughly 30 names instead of a lightly tweaked index. Priced below the typical active growth fund, with the concentration that real conviction implies.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
LRGE The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in large-capitalization companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs LRGE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs LRGE Cost
Overpaying LRGE vs JUSA
$5,856
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
LRGE 0.48%
$9,605
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | LRGE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $865 | $537 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,328 | $2,047 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $9,605 | $5,856 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.48%LRGE
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
LRGE 29th cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs LRGE Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- LRGE 0.12%
- JUSA $0.49
- LRGE $0.10
- JUSA $0.13
- LRGE $0.10
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- LRGE Dec 26, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- LRGE Dec 31, 2025
- JUSA Quarterly
- LRGE Annual
Distribution history
JUSA vs LRGE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%LRGE 15.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41LRGE 0.88
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%LRGE −37.0%
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98LRGE 1.14
JUSA and LRGE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

