GUSE vs MFSG: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

MFS Active Growth ETF

MFSGBNYSE

Overlap

41.9%by weight

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.19pt a year

GUSE0.30%MFSG0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

MFSG 2.3×the volume

GUSE24.9KMFSG57.2K

GUSE vs MFSG Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GUSE+1.7%MFSG

Expense ratio: GUSE 0.30%, better; MFSG 0.49%
Fund size: GUSE $421M; MFSG $396M
1Y total return: GUSE No data; MFSG −0.5%
Yield (12M): GUSE No data; MFSG 0.07%
Holdings: GUSE 122; MFSG 64
Avg volume (30D): GUSE 24.9K sh; MFSG 57.2K sh, better
NAV per share: GUSE $46.05; MFSG $28.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, MFSG, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	GUSE	MFSG
Cost30% weight	A97Higher	B62
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	A94Higher	C47
Tradability15% weight	C46	B62Higher
Holdings10% weight	A89Higher	B61
Durability5% weight	A85Higher	B58

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. GUSE and MFSG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds

See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and MFSG 29th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
Rank 27BNUGONuveen Growth OpportunitiesScore 59
Rank 29BMFSGMFS Active Growth ETFScore 58
Rank 30BIWFGNYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

MFSGBMFS Active Growth ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

MFSG No data

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

MFSG No data

Why people hold it

GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

MFSG No data

Worth knowing

GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

MFSG No data

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full MFSG profile⁠

GUSE vs MFSG Holdings

How GUSE and MFSG differ

Overlap by weight

41.9%

Shared holdings make up 73.3% of MFSG and 46.5% of GUSE.

Level by level

Holdings31 in both41.9%
Countryby domicile96.3%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for GUSE.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GUSE and MFSG, widest gap first
Country	More in GUSEMore in MFSG	GUSE	MFSG
United States	GUSE +3.1 points	98.9%	95.8%
Canada	MFSG +1.6 points	0.0%	1.6%
Taiwan	MFSG +1.2 points	0.6%	1.8%
Netherlands	MFSG +0.6 points	0.0%	0.6%
Other countries (2)	GUSE +0.1 points	0.5%	0.4%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

GUSE34.6%
MFSG52.9%

Securities held

GUSE121
MFSG63

Asset class

GUSE: Equity
MFSG: Equity

Holdings

Only in GUSE90
In both31
Only in MFSG32

Only in GUSE

90 securities, 51.7% of GUSE by weight

Coca-Cola Company (The)1.81%
Alphabet Inc.1.77%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.66%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.1.61%
Mastercard Incorporated1.43%
Conocophillips1.41%
Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation1.20%
Linde PLC1.17%
Walmart Inc1.07%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.1.02%
Johnson & Johnson0.93%
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated0.89%
Palantir Technologies Inc.0.88%
Netapp, Inc.0.85%
Merck & Co., Inc.0.81%
Bank of America Corp0.80%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated0.79%
Intel Corporation0.78%
Phillips 660.78%
The Procter & Gamble Company0.76%
Cintas Corporation0.75%
Intercontinental Exchange Inc0.75%
Applied Materials Inc0.73%
General Electric Company0.73%
Ameren Corporation0.73%
Caterpillar Inc (Delaware)0.69%
Cencora Inc0.62%
Csx Corporation0.62%
Atmos Energy Corporation0.60%
T-Mobile Us, Inc.0.60%
Intl Business Machines Corp0.58%
Costco Wholesale Corporation0.57%
The Home Depot, Inc.0.57%
Allstate Corporation0.56%
American Intl Group, Inc.0.55%
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.0.53%
Motorola Solutions Inc0.53%
S&P Global Inc.0.53%
Repligen Corp0.51%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.0.50%
Coca-Cola European Partners PLC0.48%
Wintrust Financial Corporation0.47%
Cheniere Energy, Inc.0.47%
Xcel Energy Inc.0.47%
Prologis Inc0.47%
Intuit Inc0.47%
Global Payments Inc.0.46%
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation0.46%
Citigroup Inc.0.45%
American Homes 4 Rent Llc0.45%

Only in MFSG

32 securities, 25.8% of MFSG by weight

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc1.74%
Waters Corp1.54%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.36%
Philip Morris International1.16%
Airbnb Incclass A1.14%
Lam Research Corp1.11%
Medtronicplc1.10%
Shopify Inc Class A1.07%
Ametek Inc1.07%
Marriott International Class A1.06%
Linde PLC1.05%
Danaher Corp1.00%
Monster Beverage Corp0.92%
Servicenowinc0.81%
Parker Hannifin Corp0.78%
Williams Cos Inc0.74%
Ww Grainger Inc0.74%
Eaton Corpplc0.72%
Spotify Technology SA0.67%
Uber Technologies Inc0.65%
Ati Inc0.65%
Autodesk Inc0.60%
Asm International NV0.52%
Crh PLC0.52%
Idexx Laboratories Inc0.51%
Viking Holdings Ltd0.46%
Cameco Corp0.43%
Robinhoodmarkets Inc A0.39%
Sk Hynix Inc Adr0.35%
Equinix Inc0.33%
Freeport Mcmoran Inc0.29%
Comfort Systems Usa Inc0.27%

Weight gaps

All 31 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GUSE and MFSG, widest gap first
Holding	More in GUSEMore in MFSG	GUSE	MFSG
Alphabet Inc.GOOGL	MFSG +6.87 points	2.76%	9.63%
NVIDIA CorporationNVDA	MFSG +6.28 points	7.53%	13.81%
Visa Inc.V	MFSG +2.65 points	1.14%	3.79%
Microsoft CorporationMSFT	MFSG +1.74 points	4.97%	6.71%
Apple Inc.AAPL	MFSG +1.71 points	5.13%	6.84%
Eli Lilly & CoLLY	GUSE +1.47 points	2.00%	0.53%
Arista Networks, Inc.ANET	MFSG +1.28 points	0.48%	1.76%
Amazon.com IncAMZN	GUSE +1.26 points	4.07%	2.81%
Ge Vernova LlcGEV	MFSG +1.18 points	0.52%	1.70%
Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg Ads-AdrTSM	MFSG +1.10 points	0.59%	1.69%
Snowflake Inc.SNOW	MFSG +1.04 points	0.28%	1.32%
Amphenol Corp Cl-A (New)APH	MFSG +0.98 points	0.50%	1.48%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.SPCX	MFSG +0.93 points	0.20%	1.13%
Tesla Inc.TSLA	GUSE +0.78 points	1.77%	0.99%
Broadcom Inc.AVGO	MFSG +0.76 points	2.39%	3.15%
Western Digital CorporationWDC	MFSG +0.75 points	0.54%	1.29%
Nasdaq Inc.NDAQ	MFSG +0.74 points	0.28%	1.02%
Kla CorpKLAC	MFSG +0.71 points	0.59%	1.30%
Micron Technology, Inc.MU	GUSE +0.69 points	1.77%	1.08%
Trane Technologies Public Limited CompanyTT	MFSG +0.55 points	0.38%	0.93%
Meta Platforms Inc-Class AMETA	MFSG +0.50 points	2.14%	2.64%
Morgan StanleyMS	MFSG +0.43 points	0.50%	0.93%
Baker Hughes CoBKR	MFSG +0.26 points	0.28%	0.54%
Cadence Design Systems IncCDNS	MFSG +0.25 points	0.57%	0.82%
Live Nation Entertainment IncLYV	MFSG +0.23 points	0.33%	0.56%
Palo Alto Networks Inc.PANW	GUSE +0.22 points	0.72%	0.50%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.AMD	GUSE +0.21 points	1.57%	1.36%
Tjx Companies Inc (New)TJX	MFSG +0.17 points	1.02%	1.19%
Tko Group Holdings IncTKO	MFSG +0.11 points	0.34%	0.45%
Rtx CorpRTX	MFSG +0.10 points	0.53%	0.63%
Starbucks Corp.SBUX	MFSG +0.09 points	0.65%	0.74%

All 121 GUSE holdings⁠All MFSG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs MFSG Cost

Overpaying MFSG vs GUSE

$3,643

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
MFSG 0.49%
$9,792

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

GUSE 0.30%
MFSG 0.49%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	GUSE	MFSG	Overpaying
10	$545	$883	$338
20	$2,113	$3,394	$1,281
30	$6,149	$9,792	$3,643

Expense ratio

0.30%GUSE, cheaper
0.49%MFSG

GUSE0.30%MFSG0.49%

0.18%2.83%

Middle half of US Active Growth funds
Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

MFSG 30th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs MFSG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): GUSE No data; MFSG 0.07%
Payout (12M): GUSE No data; MFSG $0.02
Last payment: GUSE $0.30; MFSG $0.02
Ex-dividend: GUSE Dec 23, 2025; MFSG Dec 16, 2025
Paid on: GUSE Dec 30, 2025; MFSG Dec 17, 2025
Frequency: GUSE Irregular; MFSG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠

MFSGIrregular · 2 paymentsAll MFSG payments⁠

GUSE vs MFSG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: GUSE No dataMFSG 18.2%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: GUSE No dataMFSG 0.32since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: GUSE No dataMFSG −23.2%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: GUSE 0.93MFSG 1.33; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

GUSEAvsJUSAA
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF
Expense ratio
0.30% · 0.18%
Category
MFSGBvsJUSAA
MFS Active Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF
Expense ratio
0.49% · 0.18%
Category
GUSEAvsLRGCA
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Expense ratio
0.30% · 0.39%
Category
MFSGBvsLRGCA
MFS Active Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Expense ratio
0.49% · 0.39%
Category
GUSEAvsFELGA
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio
0.30% · 0.18%
Category
MFSGBvsFELGA
MFS Active Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio
0.49% · 0.18%
Category