LRGC ranks 3rd and MFSG 29th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
LRGC vs MFSG
LRGC −0.10pt a year
0.39%0.49%
MFSG 1.7×the volume
34.1K57.2K
LRGC vs MFSG Performance
+9.5%−0.5%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- MFSG 0.49%
- LRGC $1.37B
- MFSG $396M
- LRGC +9.5%, better
- MFSG −0.5%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- MFSG 0.07%
- LRGC 72
- MFSG 64
- LRGC 34.1K sh
- MFSG 57.2K sh, better
- LRGC $85.00
- MFSG $28.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRGC | MFSG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | A90Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | B61 |
| Durability | A78Higher | B58 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. LRGC and MFSG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRGCA
MFSGB
In short
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRGC vs MFSG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRGC vs MFSG Cost
Overpaying MFSG vs LRGC
$1,894
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
MFSG 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRGC | MFSG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $883 | $178 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,394 | $669 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $9,792 | $1,894 |
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- 0.49%MFSG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
MFSG 30th cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC vs MFSG Dividends
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- MFSG 0.07%
- LRGC $0.45
- MFSG $0.02
- LRGC $0.45
- MFSG $0.02
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- MFSG Dec 16, 2025
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- MFSG Dec 17, 2025
- LRGC Annual
- MFSG Irregular
Distribution history
LRGC vs MFSG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRGC 12.7%MFSG 18.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LRGC 1.26MFSG 0.32
- Worst fall
- LRGC −19.4%MFSG −23.2%
- Market sensitivity
- LRGC 1.00MFSG 1.33
LRGC and MFSG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
