Skip to content
etf.net

GUSE vs NBGX

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Neuberger Growth ETF

NBGXDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −2.53pt a year

GUSE0.30%NBGX2.83%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 45.0×the volume

GUSE24.9KNBGX554

GUSE vs NBGX Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GUSE+3.5%NBGX

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GUSE +11.8%. NBGX +3.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
NBGX 2.83%
Fund size
GUSE $421M
NBGX $15M
1Y total return
GUSE No data
NBGX +1.1%
Holdings
GUSE 122
NBGX 58
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
NBGX 554 sh
NAV per share
GUSE $46.05
NBGX $29.65
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. NBGX: Cost 0, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 67, Durability 29.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, NBGX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSENBGX
Cost30% weightA97HigherF0
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA94HigherB63
Tradability15% weightC46HigherD39
Holdings10% weightA89HigherB67
Durability5% weightA85HigherD29

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and NBGX are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and NBGX 79th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 79DARWGArcher Growth ETFScore 31
  5. Rank 79DNBGXNeuberger Growth ETFScore 31
  6. Rank 81DTSELTouchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

NBGXDNeuberger Growth ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

NBGX No data

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

NBGX No data

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

NBGX No data

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

NBGX No data

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full NBGX profile⁠

GUSE vs NBGX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs NBGX Cost

Overpaying NBGX vs GUSE

$35,911

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • NBGX 2.83%

    $42,060

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • NBGX 2.83%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K$40K$50K051015202530NBGX $42,060GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSENBGXOverpaying
10$545$4,625$4,080
20$2,113$16,058$13,945
30$6,149$42,060$35,911

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 2.83%NBGX
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

NBGX 90th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs NBGX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
NBGX $0.12
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
NBGX Dec 19, 2025
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
NBGX Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
NBGX Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
NBGXIrregular · 1 paymentAll NBGX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2025 $0.12. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

GUSE vs NBGX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataNBGX 16.2%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataNBGX 0.46since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataNBGX −21.6%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.93NBGX 1.21

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NBGXDvsJUSAA

    Neuberger Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    2.83% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NBGXDvsLRGCA

    Neuberger Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    2.83% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NBGXDvsFELGA

    Neuberger Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    2.83% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.