Skip to content
etf.net

LRGC vs NBGX

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Neuberger Growth ETF

NBGXDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −2.44pt a year

LRGC0.39%NBGX2.83%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 61.5×the volume

LRGC34.1KNBGX554

LRGC vs NBGX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.5%LRGC+1.1%NBGX

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. LRGC +9.5%. NBGX +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LRGC 0.39%, better
NBGX 2.83%
Fund size
LRGC $1.37B
NBGX $15M
1Y total return
LRGC +9.5%, better
NBGX +1.1%
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
NBGX No data
Holdings
LRGC 72
NBGX 58
Avg volume (30D)
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
NBGX 554 sh
NAV per share
LRGC $85.00
NBGX $29.65
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78. NBGX: Cost 0, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 67, Durability 29.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGC, NBGX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGCNBGX
Cost30% weightA82HigherF0
Mission25% weightA79Not scored
Risk15% weightA90HigherB63
Tradability15% weightA75HigherD39
Holdings10% weightA77HigherB67
Durability5% weightA78HigherD29

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGC and NBGX are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and NBGX 79th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 79DARWGArcher Growth ETFScore 31
  6. Rank 79DNBGXNeuberger Growth ETFScore 31
  7. Rank 81DTSELTouchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

NBGXDNeuberger Growth ETF

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

NBGX No data

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

NBGX No data

Why people hold it

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

NBGX No data

Worth knowing

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

NBGX No data

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full NBGX profile⁠

LRGC vs NBGX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGC vs NBGX Cost

Overpaying NBGX vs LRGC

$34,162

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • NBGX 2.83%

    $42,060

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGC 0.39%
  • NBGX 2.83%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K$40K$50K051015202530NBGX $42,060LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearLRGCNBGXOverpaying
10$705$4,625$3,920
20$2,725$16,058$13,333
30$7,898$42,060$34,162

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • 2.83%NBGX
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

NBGX 90th cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC vs NBGX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
NBGX No data
Payout (12M)
LRGC $0.45
NBGX No data
Last payment
LRGC $0.45
NBGX $0.12
Ex-dividend
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
NBGX Dec 19, 2025
Paid on
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
NBGX Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
LRGC Annual
NBGX Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
NBGXIrregular · 1 paymentAll NBGX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2025 $0.12. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

LRGC vs NBGX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGC 12.7%NBGX 16.2%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGC 1.26NBGX 0.46since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023NBGX −21.6%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGC 1.00NBGX 1.21

LRGC and NBGX in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NBGXDvsJUSAA

    Neuberger Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    2.83% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NBGXDvsGUSEA

    Neuberger Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    2.83% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NBGXDvsFELGA

    Neuberger Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    2.83% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.