GUSE ranks 2nd and PGRO 24th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GUSE vs PGRO
GUSE −0.19pt a year
0.30%0.49%
PGRO 2.0×the volume
24.9K50K
GUSE vs PGRO Performance
+11.8%+1.8%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- PGRO 0.49%
- GUSE $421M
- PGRO $210M
- GUSE
- PGRO −0.9%
- GUSE
- PGRO 0.02%
- GUSE 122
- PGRO 40
- GUSE 24.9K sh
- PGRO 50K sh, better
- GUSE $46.05
- PGRO $45.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSE | PGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B62 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A94Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | C46 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C50 |
| Durability | A85Higher | A74 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GUSE and PGRO are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSEA
PGROB
In short
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
PGRO One of Putnam's first four ETFs back in 2021, PGRO runs a deliberately concentrated book of US large-cap growth names against the Russell 1000 Growth. Stock picking, not factor renting.
Stated mandate
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
PGRO The fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in large U.S. common stocks selected for growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSE vs PGRO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSE vs PGRO Cost
Overpaying PGRO vs GUSE
$3,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
PGRO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSE | PGRO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $883 | $338 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,394 | $1,281 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $9,792 | $3,643 |
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- 0.49%PGRO
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
PGRO 30th cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE vs PGRO Dividends
- GUSE
- PGRO 0.02%
- GUSE
- PGRO $0.0094
- GUSE $0.30
- PGRO $0.0094
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- PGRO Dec 19, 2025
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- PGRO Dec 23, 2025
- GUSE Irregular
- PGRO Annual
Distribution history
GUSE vs PGRO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GUSE PGRO 17.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- GUSE PGRO 0.99
- Worst fall
- GUSE PGRO −34.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GUSE 0.93PGRO 1.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.