LRGC ranks 3rd and PGRO 24th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
LRGC vs PGRO
LRGC −0.10pt a year
0.39%0.49%
PGRO 1.5×the volume
34.1K50K
PGRO +0.8pt
+21.5%+22.3%
LRGC vs PGRO Performance
+9.5%−0.9%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- PGRO 0.49%
- LRGC $1.37B
- PGRO $210M
- LRGC +9.5%, better
- PGRO −0.9%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- PGRO 0.02%
- LRGC 72
- PGRO 40
- LRGC 34.1K sh
- PGRO 50K sh, better
- LRGC $85.00
- PGRO $45.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRGC | PGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | A90Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A75 | A75 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | C50 |
| Durability | A78Higher | A74 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. LRGC and PGRO are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRGCA
PGROB
In short
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
PGRO One of Putnam's first four ETFs back in 2021, PGRO runs a deliberately concentrated book of US large-cap growth names against the Russell 1000 Growth. Stock picking, not factor renting.
Stated mandate
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
PGRO The fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in large U.S. common stocks selected for growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRGC vs PGRO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRGC vs PGRO Cost
Overpaying PGRO vs LRGC
$1,894
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
PGRO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRGC | PGRO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $883 | $178 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,394 | $669 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $9,792 | $1,894 |
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- 0.49%PGRO
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
PGRO 30th cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC vs PGRO Dividends
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- PGRO 0.02%
- LRGC $0.45
- PGRO $0.0094
- LRGC $0.45
- PGRO $0.0094
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- PGRO Dec 19, 2025
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- PGRO Dec 23, 2025
- LRGC Annual
- PGRO Annual
Distribution history
LRGC vs PGRO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRGC 12.7%, betterPGRO 17.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- LRGC 1.26, betterPGRO 0.99
- Worst fall
- LRGC −19.4%PGRO −34.7%
- Market sensitivity
- LRGC 1.00PGRO 1.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
