Skip to content

GUSE vs RJCA

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF

RJCACNYSE Arca

Overlap

43.8%by weight

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.31pt a year

GUSE0.30%RJCA0.61%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 1.6×the volume

GUSE24.9KRJCA15.6K

GUSE vs RJCA Performance

Oct 2, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−2.4%GUSE−8.6%RJCA

Oct 2, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. GUSE −2.4%. RJCA −8.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%−4%0%2%Oct 2Oct 16Nov 2
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
RJCA 0.61%
Fund size
GUSE $413M
RJCA $570M
Holdings
GUSE 122
RJCA 71
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
RJCA 15.6K sh
NAV per share
GUSE $45.25
RJCA $69.90
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. RJCA: Cost 30, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 71, Holdings 59, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, RJCA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSERJCA
Cost30% weightA97HigherD30
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA94HigherB55
Tradability15% weightC46A71Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherB59
Durability5% weightA85HigherC54

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and RJCA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and RJCA 44th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 44CPRCSParnassus Core Select ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 44CRJCARJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 48CAFGRFirst Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

RJCACRJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

RJCA No data

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

RJCA No data

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

RJCA No data

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

RJCA No data

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full RJCA profile⁠

GUSE vs RJCA Holdings

How GUSE and RJCA differ

Overlap by weight

43.8%

Shared holdings make up 74.1% of RJCA and 46.6% of GUSE.

Level by level

  • Holdings28 in both43.8%
  • Countryby domicile99.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for GUSE and RJCA.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GUSE and RJCA, widest gap first
CountryMore in GUSEMore in RJCA
TaiwanGUSE +0.6 points
Other countries (3)RJCA +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GUSE34.6%
  • RJCA55.8%

Securities held

  • GUSE121
  • RJCA70

Asset class

GUSE
Equity
RJCA
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GUSE93
  • In both28
  • Only in RJCA42

Only in GUSE

93 securities, 51.5% of GUSE by weight

  • Coca-Cola Company (The)1.87%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co1.66%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc.1.64%

Only in RJCA

42 securities, 25.5% of RJCA by weight

  • Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The1.49%
  • AbbVie Inc1.31%
  • Gilead Sciences Inc1.29%

Weight gaps

All 28 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GUSE and RJCA, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GUSEMore in RJCA
NVIDIA CorporationNVDARJCA +7.11 points
Microsoft CorporationMSFTRJCA +3.35 points
Broadcom Inc.AVGORJCA +2.80 points
Apple Inc.AAPLRJCA +2.69 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNGUSE +2.01 points
Eli Lilly & CoLLYRJCA +1.98 points
Micron Technology, Inc.MURJCA +1.61 points
Alphabet Inc.GOOGRJCA +1.44 points

All 121 GUSE holdings⁠All 72 RJCA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs RJCA Cost

Overpaying RJCA vs GUSE

$5,849

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • RJCA 0.61%

    $11,998

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • RJCA 0.61%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530RJCA $11,998GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSERJCAOverpaying
10$545$1,093$548
20$2,113$4,181$2,068
30$6,149$11,998$5,849

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.61%RJCA
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

RJCA 62nd cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs RJCA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
RJCA None
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
RJCA No data
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
RJCA No data
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
RJCA No data
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
RJCA No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
RJCAAll RJCA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GUSE vs RJCA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.94RJCA 1.14

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RJCACvsJUSAA

    RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RJCACvsLRGCA

    RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RJCACvsFELGA

    RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.