Skip to content

LRGC vs RJCA

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF

RJCACNYSE Arca

Overlap

37.1%by weight

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.22pt a year

LRGC0.39%RJCA0.61%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 2.2×the volume

LRGC34.1KRJCA15.6K

LRGC vs RJCA Performance

Oct 2, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−2.1%LRGC−8.6%RJCA

Oct 2, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. LRGC −2.1%. RJCA −8.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%−4%0%2%Oct 2Oct 16Nov 2
Expense ratio
LRGC 0.39%, better
RJCA 0.61%
Fund size
LRGC $1.35B
RJCA $570M
1Y total return
LRGC +9.2%
RJCA No data
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
RJCA No data
Holdings
LRGC 72
RJCA 71
Avg volume (30D)
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
RJCA 15.6K sh
NAV per share
LRGC $85.00
RJCA $69.90
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78. RJCA: Cost 30, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 71, Holdings 59, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGC, RJCA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGCRJCA
Cost30% weightA82HigherD30
Mission25% weightA79Not scored
Risk15% weightA90HigherB55
Tradability15% weightA75HigherA71
Holdings10% weightA77HigherB59
Durability5% weightA78HigherC54

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGC and RJCA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and RJCA 44th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 44CPRCSParnassus Core Select ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 44CRJCARJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETFScore 48
  7. Rank 48CAFGRFirst Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

RJCACRJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

RJCA No data

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

RJCA No data

Why people hold it

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

RJCA No data

Worth knowing

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

RJCA No data

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full RJCA profile⁠

LRGC vs RJCA Holdings

How LRGC and RJCA differ

Overlap by weight

37.1%

Shared holdings make up 56.0% of RJCA and 44.4% of LRGC.

Level by level

  • Holdings13 in both37.1%
  • Countryby domicile96.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for RJCA.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in LRGC and RJCA, widest gap first
CountryMore in LRGCMore in RJCA
United StatesRJCA +3.3 points
TaiwanLRGC +1.2 points
NetherlandsLRGC +1.2 points
CanadaLRGC +0.7 points
Other countries (2)LRGC +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LRGC42.4%
  • RJCA55.8%

Securities held

  • LRGC71
  • RJCA70

Asset class

LRGC
Equity
RJCA
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in LRGC58
  • In both13
  • Only in RJCA57

Only in LRGC

58 securities, 55.3% of LRGC by weight

  • Exxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock1.86%
  • Eog Resources Inc Common Stock USD.011.73%
  • Rtx Corp Common Stock USD1.01.72%

Only in RJCA

57 securities, 43.6% of RJCA by weight

  • Alphabet Inc4.12%
  • Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.52%
  • Tesla Inc2.05%

Weight gaps

All 13 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in LRGC and RJCA, widest gap first
HoldingMore in LRGCMore in RJCA
NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.001NVDARJCA +6.97 points
Eli Lilly & Co Common StockLLYRJCA +3.07 points
Micron Technology Inc Common Stock USD.1MURJCA +2.54 points
Amazon.com Inc Common Stock USD.01AMZNLRGC +2.48 points
Broadcom Inc Common StockAVGORJCA +2.42 points
Alphabet Inc Class C Common Stock USD.001GOOGLRGC +1.89 points
Apple Inc Common Stock USD.00001AAPLRJCA +1.86 points
Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.00000625MSFTRJCA +1.40 points

All 70 LRGC holdings⁠All 72 RJCA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGC vs RJCA Cost

Overpaying RJCA vs LRGC

$4,100

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • RJCA 0.61%

    $11,998

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGC 0.39%
  • RJCA 0.61%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530RJCA $11,998LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearLRGCRJCAOverpaying
10$705$1,093$388
20$2,725$4,181$1,456
30$7,898$11,998$4,100

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • 0.61%RJCA
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

RJCA 62nd cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC vs RJCA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
RJCA No data
Payout (12M)
LRGC $0.45
RJCA None
Last payment
LRGC $0.45
RJCA No data
Ex-dividend
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
RJCA No data
Paid on
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
RJCA No data
Frequency
LRGC Annual
RJCA No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
RJCAAll RJCA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGC vs RJCA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGC 12.7%RJCA No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGC 1.26RJCA No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023RJCA No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGC 1.00RJCA 1.14

LRGC and RJCA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RJCACvsJUSAA

    RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RJCACvsGUSEA

    RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RJCACvsFELGA

    RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.