Skip to content

GUSE vs TIH

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

The Investment House ETF

TIHDNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.70pt a year

GUSE0.30%TIH1.00%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 1.8×the volume

GUSE24.9KTIH14K

GUSE vs TIH Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.0%GUSE−3.7%TIH

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GUSE −1.0%. TIH −3.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
TIH 1.00%
Fund size
GUSE $421M
TIH $626M
Holdings
GUSE 122
TIH 99
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
TIH 14K sh
NAV per share
GUSE $46.05
TIH $23.64
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. TIH: Cost 2, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings 83, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, TIH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSETIH
Cost30% weightA97HigherF2
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA94HigherB64
Tradability15% weightC46HigherD38
Holdings10% weightA89HigherA83
Durability5% weightA85HigherB55

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and TIH are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and TIH 75th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 75DSEMGSuncoast Select Growth ETFScore 35
  5. Rank 75DTIHThe Investment House ETFScore 35
  6. Rank 77DGKAdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

TIHDThe Investment House ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

TIH No data

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

TIH No data

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

TIH No data

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

TIH No data

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full TIH profile⁠

GUSE vs TIH Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs TIH Cost

Overpaying TIH vs GUSE

$12,539

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • TIH 1.00%

    $18,688

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • TIH 1.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TIH $18,688GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSETIHOverpaying
10$545$1,763$1,218
20$2,113$6,625$4,512
30$6,149$18,688$12,539

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 1.00%TIH
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

TIH 88th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs TIH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
TIH None
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
TIH No data
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
TIH No data
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
TIH No data
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
TIH No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
TIHAll TIH payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GUSE vs TIH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.93TIH 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TIHDvsJUSAA

    The Investment House ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TIHDvsLRGCA

    The Investment House ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TIHDvsFELGA

    The Investment House ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.