Skip to content
etf.net

LRGC vs TIH

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

The Investment House ETF

TIHDNasdaq

Overlap

32.9%by weight

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.61pt a year

LRGC0.39%TIH1.00%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 2.4×the volume

LRGC34.1KTIH14K

LRGC vs TIH Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.1%LRGC−3.7%TIH

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. LRGC −1.1%. TIH −3.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
LRGC 0.39%, better
TIH 1.00%
Fund size
LRGC $1.37B
TIH $626M
1Y total return
LRGC +9.5%
TIH No data
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
TIH No data
Holdings
LRGC 72
TIH 99
Avg volume (30D)
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
TIH 14K sh
NAV per share
LRGC $85.00
TIH $23.64
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78. TIH: Cost 2, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings 83, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGC, TIH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGCTIH
Cost30% weightA82HigherF2
Mission25% weightA79Not scored
Risk15% weightA90HigherB64
Tradability15% weightA75HigherD38
Holdings10% weightA77A83Higher
Durability5% weightA78HigherB55

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGC and TIH are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and TIH 75th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 75DSEMGSuncoast Select Growth ETFScore 35
  6. Rank 75DTIHThe Investment House ETFScore 35
  7. Rank 77DGKAdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

TIHDThe Investment House ETF

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

TIH No data

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

TIH No data

Why people hold it

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

TIH No data

Worth knowing

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

TIH No data

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full TIH profile⁠

LRGC vs TIH Holdings

How LRGC and TIH differ

Overlap by weight

32.9%

Shared holdings make up 53.0% of LRGC and 37.8% of TIH.

Level by level

  • Holdings21 in both32.9%
  • Sector11 Sectors90.3%
  • Countryby domicile94.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in LRGC and TIH, widest gap first
SectorMore in LRGCMore in TIH
Consumer DiscretionaryTIH +4.1 points
EnergyLRGC +3.1 points
Health CareTIH +2.9 points
UtilitiesLRGC +1.7 points
Consumer StaplesTIH +1.6 points
IndustrialsLRGC +1.4 points
TechnologyTIH +1.3 points
Real EstateLRGC +1.2 points
CommunicationLRGC +1.2 points
FinancialsLRGC +0.9 points
MaterialsLRGC +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in LRGC and TIH, widest gap first
CountryMore in LRGCMore in TIH
BrazilTIH +4.1 points
United StatesLRGC +2.3 points
TaiwanLRGC +1.2 points
United KingdomLRGC +0.8 points
SwitzerlandTIH +0.7 points
CanadaLRGC +0.6 points
Other countries (3)TIH +0.2 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LRGC42.5%
  • TIH39.1%

Securities held

  • LRGC71
  • TIH99

Asset class

LRGC
Equity
TIH
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in LRGC50
  • In both21
  • Only in TIH78

Only in LRGC

50 securities, 46.9% of LRGC by weight

  • Exxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock1.79%
  • Rtx Corp Common Stock USD1.01.69%
  • Eog Resources Inc Common Stock USD.011.67%

Only in TIH

78 securities, 62.2% of TIH by weight

  • Alphabet Inc3.92%
  • Dell Technologies Inc3.73%
  • Costco Wholesale Corp3.61%

Weight gaps

All 21 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in LRGC and TIH, widest gap first
HoldingMore in LRGCMore in TIH
NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.001NVDALRGC +3.24 points
Alphabet Inc Class C Common Stock USD.001GOOGLRGC +3.13 points
Eli Lilly & Co Common StockLLYTIH +2.40 points
Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.00000625MSFTLRGC +2.16 points
Schwab (Charles) Corp Common Stock USD.01SCHWLRGC +1.49 points
Bank of America Corp Common Stock USD.01BACLRGC +1.31 points
Meta Platforms Inc Class A Common Stock USD.000006METATIH +1.23 points
Amazon.com Inc Common Stock USD.01AMZNLRGC +1.21 points

All 70 LRGC holdings⁠All TIH holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGC vs TIH Cost

Overpaying TIH vs LRGC

$10,790

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • TIH 1.00%

    $18,688

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGC 0.39%
  • TIH 1.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TIH $18,688LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearLRGCTIHOverpaying
10$705$1,763$1,058
20$2,725$6,625$3,900
30$7,898$18,688$10,790

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • 1.00%TIH
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

TIH 88th cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC vs TIH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
TIH No data
Payout (12M)
LRGC $0.45
TIH None
Last payment
LRGC $0.45
TIH No data
Ex-dividend
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
TIH No data
Paid on
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
TIH No data
Frequency
LRGC Annual
TIH No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
TIHAll TIH payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGC vs TIH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGC 12.7%TIH No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGC 1.26TIH No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023TIH No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGC 1.00TIH 0.00

LRGC and TIH in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TIHDvsJUSAA

    The Investment House ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TIHDvsGUSEA

    The Investment House ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TIHDvsFELGA

    The Investment House ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.