Skip to content

GUSE vs ZDIS

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

VIRTUS ZEVENBERGEN DISCOVERY GROWTH ETF

ZDIS—NYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.45pt a year

GUSE0.30%ZDIS0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 16.6×the volume

GUSE32.3KZDIS1.94K

GUSE vs ZDIS Performance

Oct 9, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−3.5%GUSE−15.4%ZDIS

Oct 9, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. GUSE −3.5%. ZDIS −15.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%Oct 9Oct 23Nov 9
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
ZDIS 0.75%
Fund size
GUSE $417M
ZDIS $56M
Holdings
GUSE 122
ZDIS 31
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 32.3K sh, better
ZDIS 1.94K sh
NAV per share
GUSE $43.96
ZDIS $50.98
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —ZDISNot yet graded
GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 95, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 85, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, ZDIS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSEZDIS
Cost30% weightA97Not scored
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA95Not scored
Tradability15% weightC46Not scored
Holdings10% weightA85Not scored
Durability5% weightA85Not scored

Rank among US Active Growth funds

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 83
  4. ZDISNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

ZDIS—VIRTUS ZEVENBERGEN DISCOVERY GROWTH ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

ZDIS No data

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

ZDIS No data

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

ZDIS No data

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

ZDIS No data

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full ZDIS profile⁠

GUSE vs ZDIS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs ZDIS Cost

Overpaying ZDIS vs GUSE

$8,333

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • ZDIS 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • ZDIS 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530ZDIS $14,482GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSEZDISOverpaying
10$545$1,336$791
20$2,113$5,078$2,965
30$6,149$14,482$8,333

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.75%ZDIS
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

ZDIS 72nd cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs ZDIS Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
ZDIS None
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
ZDIS No data
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
ZDIS No data
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
ZDIS No data
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
ZDIS No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
ZDISAll ZDIS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GUSE vs ZDIS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.94ZDIS 1.89

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZDIS—vsJUSAA

    VIRTUS ZEVENBERGEN DISCOVERY GROWTH ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZDIS—vsLRGCA

    VIRTUS ZEVENBERGEN DISCOVERY GROWTH ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZDIS—vsFELGA

    VIRTUS ZEVENBERGEN DISCOVERY GROWTH ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.