Skip to content

HAP vs TURF

VanEck Natural Resources ETF

HAPBNYSE Arca

T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF

TURFBNasdaq

Overlap

18.3%by weight

Expense ratio

HAP −0.03pt a year

HAP0.41%TURF0.44%

Avg volume · 30D

TURF 2.7×the volume

HAP27.9KTURF74.3K

HAP vs TURF Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+31.6%HAP+23.5%TURF

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. HAP +31.6%. TURF +23.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%40%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
HAP 0.41%, better
TURF 0.44%
Fund size
HAP $326M
TURF $340M
1Y total return
HAP +31.6%, better
TURF +23.5%
Yield (12M)
HAP 1.85%
TURF No data
Holdings
HAP 130
TURF 96
Avg volume (30D)
HAP 27.9K sh
TURF 74.3K sh, better
NAV per share
HAP $74.17
TURF $33.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HAP: Cost 68, Risk 75, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 73, Durability 58. TURF: Cost 61, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings 76, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for HAP, TURF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHAPTURF
Cost30% weightB68HigherB61
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA75HigherC43
Tradability15% weightB64B68Higher
Holdings10% weightA73A76Higher
Durability5% weightB58HigherC49

Rank among Natural Resources funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HAP and TURF are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Natural Resources⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

HAP ranks 4th and TURF 7th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.

  1. Rank 1AIGEiShares North American Natural Resources ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AGNRState Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETFScore 75
  3. Rank 2ANANRState Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4BHAPVanEck Natural Resources ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 5BCCNRALPS Funds CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 5BGUNRNorthern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETFScore 62
  7. Rank 7BTURFT. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETFScore 59
  8. Rank 8CNRESXtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETFScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HAPBVanEck Natural Resources ETF

TURFBT. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF

In short

HAP Metals, energy and farm goods in one global basket. HAP has held hard-asset producers since 2008, spreading across roughly 150 companies worldwide rather than betting on one commodity or one continent.

TURF An active bet on the companies that dig, drill and develop. TURF keeps at least 80% of net assets in upstream natural-resource names, holds roughly 80 of them, and charges less than the typical global thematic fund.

Stated mandate

HAP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Market Vector Global Natural Resources Index, which covers global natural-resources companies involved in metals, energy sources, and agricultural products.

TURF The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in upstream natural-resource companies engaged in exploration, extraction, or development.

Why people hold it

  • HAP Global by mandate, not North America only like IGE or NANR: it holds producers of metals, energy sources and agricultural products around the world.
  • Launched in 2008, so the fund has run through a full commodity boom and bust, not just the last good stretch.
  • About 150 holdings across three resource groups, so no single miner, driller or grain house runs the show.
  • TURF Active management at 0.44%, below the 0.56% median expense ratio for its global thematic peer group.
  • The mandate is specific: at least 80% of net assets in upstream companies doing exploration, extraction or development, not the refiners and shippers further down the chain.
  • Concentrated by design at roughly 80 holdings, with managers free to mix growth and value picks rather than mirror a commodity index.
  • Rates as one of the stronger implementations in its global thematic cohort, helped by tight, orderly trading.

Worth knowing

  • HAP No price edge: the 0.41% fee lands exactly at the category median, and peers such as NANR (0.35%) and IGE (0.37%) charge less.
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads can run wider than in the category's busiest names.
  • Cash arrives once or twice a year, not quarterly or monthly.
  • TURF Launched in 2025, so the record is short and the risk read on it is still thin.
  • Upstream resource stocks track commodity cycles closely, so the ride can be far bumpier than a broad equity fund.
  • Income is not the point: capital appreciation is the stated goal, distributions are annual, and part of a payout can be return of capital.

Full HAP profile⁠

Full TURF profile⁠

HAP vs TURF Holdings

How HAP and TURF differ

Overlap by weight

18.3%

Shared holdings make up 29.3% of TURF and 21.7% of HAP.

Level by level

  • Holdings22 in both18.3%
  • Countryby domicile69.4%
  • Sector9 Sectors74.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in HAP and TURF, widest gap first
SectorMore in HAPMore in TURF
MaterialsTURF +13.3 points
IndustrialsHAP +11.5 points
UtilitiesHAP +9.0 points
Consumer StaplesTURF +8.3 points
Health CareHAP +3.7 points
EnergyTURF +3.4 points
TechnologyHAP +0.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryTURF +0.5 points
Real EstateHAP +0.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in HAP and TURF, widest gap first
CountryMore in HAPMore in TURF
CanadaTURF +16.1 points
United StatesHAP +13.7 points
SpainHAP +4.9 points
GermanyHAP +3.6 points
ChinaTURF +3.5 points
NorwayTURF +3.0 points
JapanHAP +2.1 points
SwitzerlandTURF +2.0 points
Other countries (17)HAP +0.3 points

Outside the US: HAP 89% developed, 11% emerging. TURF 88% developed, 12% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • HAP38.6%
  • TURF37.4%

Securities held

  • HAP124
  • TURF89

Asset class

HAP
Equity
TURF
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in HAP102
  • In both22
  • Only in TURF67

Only in HAP

102 securities, 77.7% of HAP by weight

  • Exxon Mobil Corp6.03%
  • Deere & Co5.28%
  • Iberdrola Sa4.33%

Only in TURF

67 securities, 73.1% of TURF by weight

  • Exxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock5.80%
  • Shell PLC Common Stock EUR.075.13%
  • Bhp Group Ltd Common Stock4.00%

Weight gaps

All 22 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in HAP and TURF, widest gap first
HoldingMore in HAPMore in TURF
Chevron CorpCVXHAP +2.01 points
Tyson Foods IncTSNTURF +1.30 points
ConocophillipsCOPTURF +1.22 points
Vylor IncVYLRHAP +1.14 points
Mowi AsaTURF +1.14 points
Freeport-Mcmoran IncFCXTURF +1.03 points
Cf Industries Holdings IncCFTURF +0.92 points
First Quantum Minerals LtdTURF +0.76 points

All 146 HAP holdings⁠All 82 TURF holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HAP vs TURF Cost

Overpaying TURF vs HAP

$571

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HAP 0.41%

    $8,281

  • TURF 0.44%

    $8,852

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HAP 0.41%
  • TURF 0.44%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530TURF $8,852HAP $8,281

Year by year

YearHAPTURFOverpaying
10$741$794$53
20$2,860$3,061$201
30$8,281$8,852$571

Expense ratio

  • 0.41%HAP, cheaper
  • 0.44%TURF
  • Middle half of Natural Resources funds
  • Median 0.46%

HAP 5th cheapest of 14 funds

TURF 6th cheapest of 14 funds

HAP vs TURF Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
HAP 1.85%
TURF No data
Payout (12M)
HAP $1.36
TURF No data
Last payment
HAP $1.36
TURF $0.43
Ex-dividend
HAP Dec 22, 2025
TURF Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
HAP Dec 26, 2025
TURF Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
HAP Annual
TURF Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

HAPAnnual · 9 paymentsAll HAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.75; Dec 20, 2018 $0.92; Dec 23, 2019 $1.00; Dec 21, 2020 $0.94; Dec 20, 2021 $1.02; Dec 19, 2022 $1.61; Dec 18, 2023 $1.60; Dec 23, 2024 $1.21; Dec 22, 2025 $1.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
TURFIrregular · 1 paymentAll TURF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.43. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

HAP vs TURF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HAP 15.1%TURF 19.7%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HAP 0.98TURF 1.08since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HAP −25.7%TURF −13.2%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HAP 0.59TURF −0.07

Popular comparisons

  • HAPBvsIGEA

    VanEck Natural Resources ETF · iShares North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.41% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TURFBvsIGEA

    T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF · iShares North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HAPBvsGNRA

    VanEck Natural Resources ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.41% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TURFBvsGNRA

    T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HAPBvsNANRA

    VanEck Natural Resources ETF · State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.41% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TURFBvsNANRA

    T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF · State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.