HBDC ranks 1st and QIS 23rd of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
HBDC vs QIS
HBDC −0.74pt a year
0.39%1.13%
QIS 1.04×the volume
8.86K9.23K
HBDC vs QIS Performance
+2.9%−49.5%
- HBDC 0.39%, better
- QIS 1.13%
- HBDC $91M
- QIS $42M
- HBDC +2.9%, better
- QIS −49.5%
- HBDC 5.11%
- QIS 6.64%, better
- HBDC 156
- QIS 20
- HBDC 8.86K sh
- QIS 9.23K sh, better
- HBDC $24.50
- QIS $9.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HBDC | QIS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C52 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | F1 |
| Tradability | C50Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | C49 | B61Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. HBDC and QIS are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HBDCA
QISD
In short
HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.
QIS Investment banks build quant 'risk premia' strategies for pensions and hedge funds. QIS packages a basket of those third-party strategies into an ETF, using total return swaps, aiming for returns that move independently of stocks and bonds.
Stated mandate
HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.
QIS The fund seeks positive absolute returns and income by investing in a diversified portfolio of quantitative strategies intended to provide an uncorrelated positive source of returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HBDC vs QIS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HBDC vs QIS Cost
Overpaying QIS vs HBDC
$12,866
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HBDC 0.39%
$7,898
QIS 1.13%
$20,764
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HBDC | QIS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,981 | $1,276 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $7,403 | $4,678 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $20,764 | $12,866 |
- 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
- 1.13%QIS
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
HBDC cheapest of 29 funds
QIS 15th cheapest of 29 funds
HBDC vs QIS Dividends
- HBDC 5.11%
- QIS 6.64%, better
- HBDC $1.25
- QIS $0.60
- HBDC $0.11
- QIS $0.50
- HBDC Oct 29, 2026
- QIS Sep 25, 2026
- HBDC Oct 30, 2026
- QIS Sep 30, 2026
- HBDC Monthly
- QIS Twice a year
Distribution history
HBDC vs QIS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HBDC 2.5%QIS 21.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- HBDC −0.27QIS −1.18
- Worst fall
- HBDC −3.0%QIS −63.5%
- Market sensitivity
- HBDC 0.13QIS 0.52
HBDC and QIS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

