SMH ranks 2nd and HBMX 16th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.
HBMX vs SMH
20.8%by weight
SMH −0.60pt a year
0.95%0.35%
SMH 99.5×the volume
92.1K9.16M
HBMX vs SMH Performance
−11.0%−3.3%
- HBMX 0.95%
- SMH 0.35%, better
- HBMX $20M
- SMH $66.4B
- HBMX
- SMH +44.4%
- HBMX
- SMH 0.21%
- HBMX 25
- SMH 27
- HBMX 92.1K sh
- SMH 9.16M sh, better
- HBMX $19.82
- SMH $522.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HBMX | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | F24 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | B60 |
| Durability | C40 | A92Higher |
Rank among Semiconductors funds
Same Category. HBMX and SMH are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HBMXD
SMHA
In short
SMH Chip exposure, undiluted. SMH tracks roughly 25 of the largest, most liquid US-listed semiconductor names (foreign chipmakers included) and trades like a household ticker in its category.
Stated mandate
SMH The Fund aims to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HBMX vs SMH Holdings
How HBMX and SMH differ
20.8%
Shared holdings make up 28.0% of HBMX and 21.2% of SMH.
Level by level
- Holdings20.8%
- Country65.6%
Sector
| Sector | More in HBMXMore in SMH | HBMX | SMH |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | HBMX +0.1 points | 100.0% | 99.9% |
| Energy | SMH +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in HBMXMore in SMH | HBMX | SMH |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | SMH +24.0 points | 56.9% | 80.9% |
| Japan | HBMX +18.5 points | 18.5% | 0.0% |
| China | HBMX +13.0 points | 13.0% | 0.0% |
| Taiwan | SMH +9.5 points | 0.0% | 9.5% |
| South Korea | HBMX +1.6 points | 5.8% | 4.2% |
| Netherlands | HBMX +1.3 points | 5.8% | 4.5% |
| Singapore | SMH +0.9 points | 0.0% | 0.9% |
Outside the US: HBMX 56% developed, 44% emerging.
Concentration
- HBMX59.8%
- SMH68.0%
- HBMX24
- SMH25
Asset class
- HBMX
- Equity
- SMH
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in HBMX19
- In both5
- Only in SMH20
Only in HBMX
19 securities, 69.6% of HBMX by weight
- Advantest Corp8.61%
- Penguin Solutions Inc6.86%
- SK hynix Inc5.54%
- Onto Innovation Inc5.15%
- Camtek Ltd/Israel5.12%
- Rambus Inc4.36%
- Sandisk Corp4.06%
- Silicon Motion Technology Corp3.79%
- Amkor Technology Inc3.63%
- Nova Ltd3.47%
- Kioxia Holdings Corp3.17%
- Tokyo Electron Ltd2.80%
- Disco Corp2.79%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20312.70%
- Veeco Instruments Inc2.53%
- FormFactor Inc1.77%
- Western Digital Corp1.66%
- Seagate Technology Holdings PLC0.98%
- Everspin Technologies Inc0.65%
Only in SMH
20 securities, 78.7% of SMH by weight
- Nvidia Corp19.62%
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co L9.48%
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc5.58%
- Broadcom Inc5.53%
- Texas Instruments Inc5.49%
- Analog Devices Inc4.79%
- Sk Hynix Inc4.19%
- Qualcomm Inc4.06%
- Marvell Technology Inc4.00%
- Intel Corp4.00%
- Synopsys Inc2.17%
- Cadence Design Systems Inc2.15%
- Nxp Semiconductors Nv1.23%
- Monolithic Power Systems Inc1.15%
- Teradyne Inc1.00%
- Astera Labs Inc0.99%
- Arm Holdings Plc0.96%
- Stmicroelectronics Nv0.92%
- Microchip Technology Inc0.88%
- On Semiconductor Corp0.50%
Weight gaps
All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in HBMXMore in SMH | HBMX | SMH |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology Inc | HBMX +5.60 points | 10.27% | 4.67% |
| ASML Holding NV | HBMX +1.10 points | 5.58% | 4.48% |
| Lam Research Corp | HBMX +0.51 points | 4.22% | 3.71% |
| Kla Corp | SMH +0.24 points | 3.98% | 4.22% |
| Applied Materials Inc | SMH +0.20 points | 3.95% | 4.15% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HBMX vs SMH Cost
Overpaying HBMX vs SMH
$10,743
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HBMX 0.95%
$17,869
SMH 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HBMX | SMH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $634 | $1,044 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $2,454 | $3,868 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $7,126 | $10,743 |
- 0.95%HBMX
- 0.35%SMH, cheaper
- Middle half of Semiconductors funds
- Median 0.60%
SMH 6th cheapest of 25 funds
HBMX 24th cheapest of 25 funds
HBMX vs SMH Dividends
- HBMX
- SMH 0.21%
- HBMX None
- SMH $1.10
- HBMX
- SMH $1.10
- HBMX
- SMH Dec 22, 2025
- HBMX
- SMH Dec 26, 2025
- HBMX
- SMH Annual
Distribution history
HBMX vs SMH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HBMX SMH 33.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- HBMX SMH 1.37
- Worst fall
- HBMX SMH −45.3%
- Market sensitivity
- HBMX 2.73SMH 1.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




