CHPS vs HBMX: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

CHPSANasdaq

Tuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF

HBMXDCboe

Overlap

16.2%by weight

Expense ratio

CHPS −0.80pt a year

CHPS0.15%HBMX0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

HBMX 2.7×the volume

CHPS34.5KHBMX92.1K

CHPS vs HBMX Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−5.7%CHPS−11.0%HBMX

Expense ratio: CHPS 0.15%, better; HBMX 0.95%
Fund size: CHPS $130M; HBMX $20M
1Y total return: CHPS +61.5%; HBMX No data
Yield (12M): CHPS 0.41%; HBMX No data
Holdings: CHPS 54; HBMX 25
Avg volume (30D): CHPS 34.5K sh; HBMX 92.1K sh, better
NAV per share: CHPS $75.55; HBMX $19.82
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for CHPS, HBMX, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	CHPS	HBMX
Cost30% weight	A100Higher	F4
Mission25% weight	A70	Not scored
Risk15% weight	B56Higher	F24
Tradability15% weight	C49	C51Higher
Holdings10% weight	A88Higher	B60
Durability5% weight	A70Higher	C40

Rank among Semiconductors funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. CHPS and HBMX are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Semiconductors⁠

Category · 25 funds

See all 25 ›

CHPS ranks 4th and HBMX 16th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.

Rank 1ASOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETFScore 82
Rank 2ASMHVanEck Semiconductor ETFScore 79
Rank 3ASOXXiShares Semiconductor ETFScore 78
Rank 4ACHPSXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETFScore 77
Rank 5AXSDState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETFScore 71
Rank 15DKMEMKurv Memory Select ETFScore 35
Rank 16DHBMXTuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETFScore 27
Rank 17DDISKTema Memory ETFScore 26
AHBMNot yet graded
AIFRNot yet graded
AINFNot yet graded
CGPTNot yet graded
CRAMNot yet graded
KAITNot yet graded
KSMHNot yet graded
PSOXNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CHPSAXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

HBMXDTuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF

In short

CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.

HBMX No data

Stated mandate

CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.

HBMX No data

Why people hold it

CHPS At 0.15%, one of the cheapest doors into chips. SMH and SOXX each charge more than double.
Global mandate, so foreign foundries and equipment makers are in scope, not just the US-listed marquee names.
The ESG screen sits inside the index itself: the chip universe gets filtered before the portfolio is built.
Simple plumbing. Roughly 50 holdings, one published index, cash paid out quarterly.

HBMX No data

Worth knowing

CHPS Trades thinly next to SMH and SOXX. Spreads can be wider, and size takes more care to get filled.
Launched in 2023, so the record is short against chip funds that have lived through several boom-bust cycles.
The screen excludes some chip companies outright, so the lineup can look different from unscreened rivals.

HBMX No data

Full CHPS profile⁠

Full HBMX profile⁠

CHPS vs HBMX Holdings

How CHPS and HBMX differ

Overlap by weight

16.2%

Shared holdings make up 22.4% of HBMX and 16.2% of CHPS.

Level by level

Holdings4 in both16.2%
Countryby domicile79.6%
Sector4 Sectors99.2%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CHPS and HBMX, widest gap first
Sector	More in CHPSMore in HBMX	CHPS	HBMX
Technology	HBMX +0.8 points	99.2%	100.0%
Industrials	CHPS +0.4 points	0.4%	0.0%
Energy	CHPS +0.4 points	0.4%	0.0%
Financials	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CHPS and HBMX, widest gap first
Country	More in CHPSMore in HBMX	CHPS	HBMX
China	HBMX +11.7 points	1.3%	13.0%
Taiwan	CHPS +11.6 points	11.6%	0.0%
Japan	HBMX +8.1 points	10.4%	18.5%
United States	CHPS +5.6 points	62.5%	56.9%
Germany	CHPS +1.6 points	1.6%	0.0%
Singapore	CHPS +0.7 points	0.7%	0.0%
South Korea	HBMX +0.6 points	5.2%	5.8%
Other countries (3)	CHPS +0.9 points	6.7%	5.8%

Outside the US: CHPS 50% developed, 50% emerging. HBMX 56% developed, 44% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

CHPS47.4%
HBMX59.8%

Securities held

CHPS53
HBMX24

Asset class

CHPS: Equity
HBMX: Equity

Holdings

Only in CHPS49
In both4
Only in HBMX20

Only in CHPS

49 securities, 83.7% of CHPS by weight

NVIDIA Corp5.34%
Texas Instruments Inc5.31%
Advanced Micro Dev5.20%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing4.95%
ASML Holding NV4.81%
Broadcom4.46%
Analog Devices Inc4.44%
SK Hynix Inc4.09%
MediaTek Inc3.86%
QUALCOMM Inc3.80%
Marvell Technology Group Ltd3.76%
Advantest Corp3.50%
Intel Corp3.18%
Tokyo Electron Ltd2.98%
Kioxia Holdings Corp2.16%
ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd1.69%
Infineon Technologies AG1.61%
NXP Semiconductors NV1.44%
Te Connectivity Ltd1.37%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc1.26%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co Ltd1.08%
Teradyne Inc0.94%
Microchip Technology Inc0.90%
Coherent Corp0.90%
United Microelectronics Corp0.87%
ASM International NV0.83%
Astera Labs Inc0.76%
STMicroelectronics NV0.67%
Renesas Electronics Corp0.65%
ON Semiconductor Corp0.61%
Disco Corp0.60%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.55%
Entegris Inc0.52%
Arm Holdings PLC Ads0.45%
Nanya Technology Corp0.44%
Tower Semiconductor Ltd0.43%
VAT Group AG0.41%
Lasertec Corp0.41%
First Solar Inc0.40%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings0.33%
MKS Instruments Inc0.28%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp0.28%
BE Semiconductor Indstries NV0.27%
MPI Corporation0.26%
Fabrinet0.25%
Screen Holdings Co0.24%
Taiwan Semiconductor-Sp Adr0.08%
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF0.03%
STMicroelectronics NV EUR 1.04 ADR<0.01%

Only in HBMX

20 securities, 75.2% of HBMX by weight

Advantest Corp8.61%
Penguin Solutions Inc6.86%
ASML Holding NV5.58%
SK hynix Inc5.54%
Onto Innovation Inc5.15%
Camtek Ltd/Israel5.12%
Rambus Inc4.36%
Sandisk Corp4.06%
Silicon Motion Technology Corp3.79%
Amkor Technology Inc3.63%
Nova Ltd3.47%
Kioxia Holdings Corp3.17%
Tokyo Electron Ltd2.80%
Disco Corp2.79%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20312.70%
Veeco Instruments Inc2.53%
FormFactor Inc1.77%
Western Digital Corp1.66%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC0.98%
Everspin Technologies Inc0.65%

Weight gaps

All 4 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CHPS and HBMX, widest gap first
Holding	More in CHPSMore in HBMX	CHPS	HBMX
Micron TechnologyMU	HBMX +5.30 points	4.97%	10.27%
Lam Research CorpLRCX	HBMX +0.40 points	3.82%	4.22%
Applied Materials IncAMAT	HBMX +0.31 points	3.64%	3.95%
Kla-Tencor CorpKLAC	HBMX +0.17 points	3.81%	3.98%

All 54 CHPS holdings⁠All 26 HBMX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CHPS vs HBMX Cost

Overpaying HBMX vs CHPS

$14,732

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

CHPS 0.15%
$3,137
HBMX 0.95%
$17,869

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

CHPS 0.15%
HBMX 0.95%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	CHPS	HBMX	Overpaying
10	$274	$1,678	$1,404
20	$1,071	$6,322	$5,251
30	$3,137	$17,869	$14,732

Expense ratio

0.15%CHPS, cheaper
0.95%HBMX

CHPS0.15%HBMX0.95%

0.15%1.00%

Middle half of Semiconductors funds
Median 0.60%

CHPS cheapest of 25 funds

HBMX 24th cheapest of 25 funds

CHPS vs HBMX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): CHPS 0.41%; HBMX No data
Payout (12M): CHPS $0.31; HBMX None
Last payment: CHPS $0.10; HBMX No data
Ex-dividend: CHPS Sep 18, 2026; HBMX No data
Paid on: CHPS Sep 25, 2026; HBMX No data
Frequency: CHPS Quarterly; HBMX No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CHPSQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll CHPS payments⁠

HBMXAll HBMX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CHPS vs HBMX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: CHPS 41.2%HBMX No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: CHPS 1.12HBMX No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: CHPS −39.4%since Jul 2023HBMX No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: CHPS 2.16HBMX 2.73; Market = 1

CHPS and HBMX in the news

All news⁠

ETF Filings
Tuttle Capital files seven autocallable ETFs on technology theme baskets
Oct 20, 2026HBMX
ETF Filings
Tuttle files eight Income Blast ETFs, including baskets that name OpenAI and Anthropic
Sep 15, 2026HBMX

Popular comparisons

CHPSAvsSOXQA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.19%
Category
HBMXDvsSOXQA
Tuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.95% · 0.19%
Category
CHPSAvsSMHA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.35%
Category
HBMXDvsSMHA
Tuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.95% · 0.35%
Category
CHPSAvsSOXXA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.33%
Category
HBMXDvsSOXXA
Tuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.95% · 0.33%
Category

CHPS vs HBMX

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How CHPS and HBMX differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in CHPS

Only in HBMX

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Tuttle Capital files seven autocallable ETFs on technology theme baskets

Tuttle files eight Income Blast ETFs, including baskets that name OpenAI and Anthropic

How CHPS and HBMX differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in CHPS

Only in HBMX

Weight gaps