Skip to content

HF vs RISN

DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF

HFDNYSE

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

RISN −0.98pt a year

HF1.70%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

RISN 37.2×the volume

HF398RISN14.8K

3Y return · a year

RISN +3.5pt

HF+9.8%RISN+13.3%

HF vs RISN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.7%HF+4.8%RISN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. HF +7.7%. RISN +4.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HF 1.70%
RISN 0.72%, better
Fund size
HF $21M
RISN $70M
1Y total return
HF +7.7%, better
RISN +4.8%
Yield (12M)
HF 0.88%
RISN 1.05%, better
Holdings
HF 18
RISN 53
Avg volume (30D)
HF 398 sh
RISN 14.8K sh, better
NAV per share
HF $22.68
RISN $31.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HF: Cost 9, Risk 75, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 51, Durability 51. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 46, Mission 85, Tradability 64, Holdings 80, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for HF, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHFRISN
Cost30% weightF9A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA85
Risk15% weightA75HigherC46
Tradability15% weightC42B64Higher
Holdings10% weightC51A80Higher
Durability5% weightC51B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HF and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and HF 40th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 38DNMBLNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETFScore 38
  7. Rank 40DHFDGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETFScore 37
  8. Rank 41DXNAVFundX Aggressive ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HFDDGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

HF Ticker HF, mandate to match: hedge-fund-style absolute return in a plain ETF wrapper, chasing appreciation with capital preservation second. The hedge-fund fee came along too: 1.70% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

HF The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation, with capital preservation as a secondary objective.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • HF The prospectus commits to both goals: long-term capital appreciation first, capital preservation second. Most tactical funds name one and leave the rest to interpretation.
  • Ordinary 1940 Act ETF plumbing: daily liquidity, a 1099 instead of a K-1, no lockups or gates. The hedge-fund idea without the hedge-fund paperwork.sec.gov
  • Risk is the strongest part of its profile. On volatility and drawdown it has run calmer than most tactical multi-asset peers.
  • Concentrated by design, a few dozen positions, so the manager's calls actually move the portfolio instead of averaging into plain beta.
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • HF Cost is the headwind: 1.70% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026 (1.85% gross), above the category median. Peers ENDW at 0.22% and PTBD at 0.60% sit far below.
  • No declared index and no published tracking evidence, so there is no rulebook to check the strategy against. You are buying the manager's model.
  • Small and thinly traded: spreads can widen and sizeable orders can nudge the price. Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly.
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full HF profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

HF vs RISN Holdings

How HF and RISN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of HF and 0.0% of RISN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector10 Sectors27.7%
  • Countryby domicile95.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in HF and RISN, widest gap first
SectorMore in HFMore in RISN
FinancialsHF +72.3 points
IndustrialsRISN +27.2 points
EnergyRISN +15.4 points
TechnologyRISN +10.0 points
MaterialsRISN +8.1 points
Consumer DiscretionaryRISN +4.9 points
UtilitiesRISN +1.7 points
Consumer StaplesRISN +1.7 points
Real EstateRISN +1.7 points
Health CareRISN +1.6 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in HF and RISN, widest gap first
CountryMore in HFMore in RISN
United StatesRISN +4.4 points
JapanHF +0.6 points
Other countries (32)HF +3.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • HF76.0%
  • RISN35.2%

Securities held

  • HF18
  • RISN52

Asset class

HF
Equity
RISN
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in HF18
  • In both0
  • Only in RISN52

Only in HF

18 securities, 100% of HF by weight

  • ProShares UltraShort S&P50015.24%
  • Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF14.93%
  • iShares Core S&P 500 ETF9.18%

Only in RISN

52 securities, 100% of RISN by weight

  • Wisdomtree Float19.09%
  • United Parcel-B1.82%
  • Home Depot Inc1.82%

Weight gaps

HF and RISN share no securities.

All 36 HF holdings⁠All RISN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HF vs RISN Cost

Overpaying HF vs RISN

$15,084

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HF 1.70%

    $29,041

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HF 1.70%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530HF $29,041RISN $13,957

Year by year

YearHFRISNOverpaying
10$2,911$1,284$1,627
20$10,606$4,888$5,718
30$29,041$13,957$15,084

Expense ratio

  • 1.70%HF
  • 0.72%RISN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

HF 42nd cheapest of 46 funds

HF vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HF 0.88%
RISN 1.05%, better
Payout (12M)
HF $0.20
RISN $0.32
Last payment
HF $0.20
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
HF Dec 29, 2025
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
HF Dec 30, 2025
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
HF Annual
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

HFAnnual · 3 paymentsAll HF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2023 $0.51; Dec 23, 2024 $2.28; Dec 29, 2025 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

HF vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HF 6.0%, betterRISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HF 0.85, betterRISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HF −6.0%since Aug 2023RISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HF 0.42RISN 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • HFDvsENDWA

    DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HFDvsGMODA

    DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsGMODA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HFDvsPTBDA

    DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.