Skip to content

HFGO vs JUSA

Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF

HFGOCCboe

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.41pt a year

HFGO0.59%JUSA0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 2.9×the volume

HFGO34.4KJUSA98.8K

HFGO vs JUSA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−3.0%HFGO+10.8%JUSA

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. HFGO −3.0%. JUSA +10.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HFGO 0.59%
JUSA 0.18%, better
Fund size
HFGO $169M
JUSA $745M
1Y total return
HFGO −3.0%
JUSA +10.8%, better
Yield (12M)
HFGO No data
JUSA 0.72%
Holdings
HFGO 47
JUSA 263
Avg volume (30D)
HFGO 34.4K sh
JUSA 98.8K sh, better
NAV per share
HFGO $27.38
JUSA $67.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HFGO: Cost 38, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings 32, Durability 61. JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 58, Holdings 84, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for HFGO, JUSA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHFGOJUSA
Cost30% weightD38A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA84
Risk15% weightD29A92Higher
Tradability15% weightB55B58Higher
Holdings10% weightD32A84Higher
Durability5% weightB61A76Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HFGO and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and HFGO 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 60CTSCMTimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETFScore 41
  4. Rank 64CHFGOHartford Large Cap Growth ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 64CPCLCPolen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HFGOCHartford Large Cap Growth ETF

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

In short

HFGO Wellington's high-conviction growth desk in an ETF wrapper: roughly 40 large-cap names run against the Russell 1000 Growth benchmark, with the freedom to reach down the market-cap ladder for ideas.

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

HFGO The Fund seeks capital appreciation. It is actively managed and invests in large-cap securities using a growth-oriented style.

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

Why people hold it

  • HFGO Concentrated by design: about 40 holdings, so each pick carries real weight instead of being diluted across hundreds of names.
  • Actively managed and sub-advised by Wellington Management, whose team picks stocks across market caps rather than replicating an index.sec.govhartfordfunds.com
  • At 0.59%, it undercuts several rivals measured against the same Russell 1000 Growth benchmark, including TLG (0.82%), PJFG (0.75%) and LSGR (0.67%).
  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.

Worth knowing

  • HFGO 0.59% sits above the typical fund in its active large-cap growth group, and far above enhanced-index cousins like FELG (0.18%) and JUSA (0.12%).
  • Thinly traded with a modest asset base, so spreads can be wider than the mega-cap growth ETFs it competes with.
  • The mandate is capital appreciation, not income; distributions have not been a feature of this fund.
  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com

Full HFGO profile⁠

Full JUSA profile⁠

HFGO vs JUSA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HFGO vs JUSA Cost

Overpaying HFGO vs JUSA

$7,886

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HFGO 0.59%

    $11,635

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HFGO 0.59%
  • JUSA 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530HFGO $11,635JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearHFGOJUSAOverpaying
10$1,058$328$730
20$4,051$1,281$2,770
30$11,635$3,749$7,886

Expense ratio

  • 0.59%HFGO
  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

HFGO 56th cheapest of 90 funds

HFGO vs JUSA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HFGO No data
JUSA 0.72%
Payout (12M)
HFGO None
JUSA $0.49
Last payment
HFGO No data
JUSA $0.13
Ex-dividend
HFGO No data
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
HFGO No data
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
HFGO No data
JUSA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

HFGOAll HFGO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

HFGO vs JUSA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HFGO 19.8%JUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HFGO 0.98JUSA 1.41since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HFGO −44.6%since Nov 2021JUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HFGO 1.29JUSA 0.98

HFGO and JUSA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • HFGOCvsGUSEA

    Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HFGOCvsLRGCA

    Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HFGOCvsFELGA

    Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.