LRGC ranks 3rd and HFGO 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
HFGO vs LRGC
LRGC −0.20pt a year
0.59%0.39%
HFGO 1.01×the volume
34.4K34.1K
HFGO +2.8pt
+24.3%+21.5%
HFGO vs LRGC Performance
−3.0%+9.5%
- HFGO 0.59%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- HFGO $169M
- LRGC $1.37B
- HFGO −3.0%
- LRGC +9.5%, better
- HFGO
- LRGC 0.53%
- HFGO 47
- LRGC 72
- HFGO 34.4K sh, better
- LRGC 34.1K sh
- HFGO $27.38
- LRGC $85.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HFGO | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | D29 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | A77Higher |
| Durability | B61 | A78Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. HFGO and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HFGOC
LRGCA
In short
HFGO Wellington's high-conviction growth desk in an ETF wrapper: roughly 40 large-cap names run against the Russell 1000 Growth benchmark, with the freedom to reach down the market-cap ladder for ideas.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
HFGO The Fund seeks capital appreciation. It is actively managed and invests in large-cap securities using a growth-oriented style.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HFGO vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HFGO vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying HFGO vs LRGC
$3,737
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HFGO 0.59%
$11,635
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HFGO | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $705 | $353 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $2,725 | $1,326 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $7,898 | $3,737 |
- 0.59%HFGO
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
HFGO 56th cheapest of 90 funds
HFGO vs LRGC Dividends
- HFGO
- LRGC 0.53%
- HFGO None
- LRGC $0.45
- HFGO
- LRGC $0.45
- HFGO
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- HFGO
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- HFGO
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
HFGO vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HFGO 19.8%LRGC 12.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HFGO 0.98LRGC 1.26, better
- Worst fall
- HFGO −44.6%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- HFGO 1.29LRGC 1.00
HFGO and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
