LOWV ranks 4th and HUSV 6th of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.
HUSV vs LOWV
LOWV −0.31pt a year
0.70%0.39%
HUSV 2.1×the volume
15.9K7.72K
LOWV +5.4pt
+12.0%+17.4%
HUSV vs LOWV Performance
+11.0%+8.9%
- HUSV 0.70%
- LOWV 0.39%, better
- HUSV $57M
- LOWV $209M
- HUSV +11.0%, better
- LOWV +8.9%
- HUSV 1.40%, better
- LOWV 0.84%
- HUSV 101
- LOWV 73
- HUSV 15.9K sh, better
- LOWV 7.72K sh
- HUSV $41.96
- LOWV $84.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HUSV | LOWV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | B66Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | B60Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | B67 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B55 |
| Durability | B63Higher | B62 |
Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds
Same Category. HUSV and LOWV are both graded against the same 10 US Active Low Volatility funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HUSVC
LOWVB
In short
HUSV Most low-vol funds rank stocks on the calm they already showed. HUSV pays Horizon Investments to forecast it instead, then weights hardest toward the names its models expect to move least.
LOWV A stock picker's answer to low volatility. AB runs about 70 US large caps through its own quality, profitability and value screen instead of tracking a published low-vol index, at 0.39% a year.
Stated mandate
HUSV The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in domestic common stocks that the sub-advisor expects to have relatively low volatility.
LOWV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio primarily invested in U.S. large-cap equities, with an emphasis on lower volatility than the broader equity market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HUSV vs LOWV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HUSV vs LOWV Cost
Overpaying HUSV vs LOWV
$5,708
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HUSV 0.70%
$13,606
LOWV 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HUSV | LOWV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $705 | $545 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $2,725 | $2,035 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $7,898 | $5,708 |
- 0.70%HUSV
- 0.39%LOWV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
- Median 0.47%
LOWV 4th cheapest of 10 funds
HUSV 7th cheapest of 10 funds
HUSV vs LOWV Dividends
- HUSV 1.40%, better
- LOWV 0.84%
- HUSV $0.59
- LOWV $0.71
- HUSV $0.19
- LOWV $0.18
- HUSV Sep 24, 2026
- LOWV Sep 18, 2026
- HUSV Sep 30, 2026
- LOWV Sep 21, 2026
- HUSV Quarterly
- LOWV Quarterly
Distribution history
HUSV vs LOWV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HUSV 11.2%LOWV 9.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HUSV 0.68LOWV 1.24, better
- Worst fall
- HUSV −17.0%LOWV −13.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HUSV 0.45LOWV 0.73
HUSV and LOWV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

