CGCV ranks 2nd and HUSV 6th of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.
CGCV vs HUSV
CGCV −0.37pt a year
0.33%0.70%
CGCV 18.7×the volume
297K15.9K
CGCV vs HUSV Performance
+13.6%+11.0%
- CGCV 0.33%, better
- HUSV 0.70%
- CGCV $2.24B
- HUSV $57M
- CGCV +13.6%, better
- HUSV +11.0%
- CGCV 1.54%, better
- HUSV 1.40%
- CGCV 76
- HUSV 101
- CGCV 297K sh, better
- HUSV 15.9K sh
- CGCV $33.52
- HUSV $41.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGCV | HUSV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | A71Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | B67 | A78Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | B63 |
Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds
Same Category. CGCV and HUSV are both graded against the same 10 US Active Low Volatility funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGCVA
HUSVC
In short
CGCV Capital Group's stock pickers took on a three-part job in one equity fund: current income, capital growth, and preservation of principal. Roughly 100 US names, actively chosen, priced under most defensive-equity rivals.
HUSV Most low-vol funds rank stocks on the calm they already showed. HUSV pays Horizon Investments to forecast it instead, then weights hardest toward the names its models expect to move least.
Stated mandate
CGCV The fund seeks to balance current income, capital growth, and preservation of principal.
HUSV The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in domestic common stocks that the sub-advisor expects to have relatively low volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGCV vs HUSV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGCV vs HUSV Cost
Overpaying HUSV vs CGCV
$6,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGCV 0.33%
$6,737
HUSV 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGCV | HUSV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $1,250 | $652 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $4,760 | $2,442 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $13,606 | $6,869 |
- 0.33%CGCV, cheaper
- 0.70%HUSV
- Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
- Median 0.47%
CGCV 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
HUSV 7th cheapest of 10 funds
CGCV vs HUSV Dividends
- CGCV 1.54%, better
- HUSV 1.40%
- CGCV $0.52
- HUSV $0.59
- CGCV $0.13
- HUSV $0.19
- CGCV Sep 30, 2026
- HUSV Sep 24, 2026
- CGCV Oct 1, 2026
- HUSV Sep 30, 2026
- CGCV Quarterly
- HUSV Quarterly
Distribution history
CGCV vs HUSV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGCV 10.1%HUSV 11.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGCV 1.06HUSV 0.68
- Worst fall
- CGCV −13.1%HUSV −17.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CGCV 0.67HUSV 0.45
CGCV and HUSV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

