Skip to content

HUSV vs TOAK

First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF

HUSVCNYSE Arca

Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF

TOAKANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TOAK −0.44pt a year

HUSV0.70%TOAK0.26%

Avg volume · 30D

HUSV 1.5×the volume

HUSV15.9KTOAK10.9K

HUSV vs TOAK Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.0%HUSV+3.6%TOAK

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. HUSV +11.0%. TOAK +3.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HUSV 0.70%
TOAK 0.26%, better
Fund size
HUSV $57M
TOAK $101M
1Y total return
HUSV +11.0%, better
TOAK +3.6%
Yield (12M)
HUSV 1.40%
TOAK No data
Holdings
HUSV 101
TOAK 3
Avg volume (30D)
HUSV 15.9K sh, better
TOAK 10.9K sh
NAV per share
HUSV $41.96
TOAK $29.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HUSV: Cost 35, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 78, Durability 63. TOAK: Cost 86, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings not scored, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for HUSV, TOAK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHUSVTOAK
Cost30% weightD35A86Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB60B61Higher
Tradability15% weightB67HigherB60
Holdings10% weightA78Not scored
Durability5% weightB63HigherC47

Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HUSV and TOAK are both graded against the same 10 US Active Low Volatility funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Low Volatility⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

TOAK ranks 3rd and HUSV 6th of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.

  1. Rank 1ASELVSEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACGCVCapital Group Conservative Equity ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3ATOAKTwin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BLOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 5BSIXLETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 6CHUSVFirst Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETFScore 54
  7. Rank 7CSFTYHorizon Managed Risk ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HUSVCFirst Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF

TOAKATwin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF

In short

HUSV Most low-vol funds rank stocks on the calm they already showed. HUSV pays Horizon Investments to forecast it instead, then weights hardest toward the names its models expect to move least.

TOAK Shelved with low-volatility equity funds, TOAK owns no stocks. It runs a paired options book with a zero-to-one-year horizon, each position's maximum loss limited to the premium paid, at 0.26% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

HUSV The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in domestic common stocks that the sub-advisor expects to have relatively low volatility.

TOAK The Fund seeks capital appreciation with low price volatility, which the Adviser describes as stable returns. It pursues this through defined-risk options intended to generate an absolute return over a short, zero-to-one-year duration.

Why people hold it

  • HUSV The engine looks forward, not back: Horizon's models rank US-listed stocks by expected future volatility, and the calmest forecasts get the biggest weights.sec.gov
  • Quantitative at the core, human at the edges. The sub-advisor can flex the number of holdings, the weightings and how aggressive the low-vol tilt runs as markets shift.sec.gov
  • A compact book of roughly 80 domestic stocks, with a mandate to keep at least 80% of net assets in US common shares. Easy to see what you actually own.
  • Trading since 2016, so the approach has been through real drawdowns rather than a backtest. Pays quarterly.
  • TOAK Defined risk is written into the strategy: the most any single option position can lose in an expiry period is the premium paid, and the fund states it uses no leverage and sells no naked options.sec.gov
  • 0.26% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (0.46% gross) sits below the category median and under peers such as LOWV at 0.39% and SIXL at 0.46%.
  • Long calls are always paired with long puts (and call spreads with put spreads), legs that tend to move against each other. That pairing is the stated engine behind the low-volatility half of the mandate.sec.gov
  • Different wiring from its shelf-mates: an absolute-return options sleeve on broad US equity exposure rather than a screened basket of defensive stocks, and it stands in the upper half of that peer group.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • HUSV 0.70% a year, above the median for US low-vol funds, and the index-based rivals in the aisle (SELV, CGCV) charge well under that. Active forecasting is what the premium buys.
  • Thinly traded, so spreads and order timing matter more here than in the aisle's household names.
  • Low forecast volatility is an expectation, not a floor. This is a fully invested stock portfolio and it can fall with the market.sec.gov
  • TOAK Launched in 2024, so the track record is short and covers only one market stretch. It is also a smaller fund than most names on this shelf.
  • Thinly traded for its category, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the big liquid names. Limit orders matter more here.
  • No income stream: the fund has not been paying distributions, so whatever the options book produces shows up in share price, not as yield.

Full HUSV profile⁠

Full TOAK profile⁠

HUSV vs TOAK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HUSV vs TOAK Cost

Overpaying HUSV vs TOAK

$8,248

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HUSV 0.70%

    $13,606

  • TOAK 0.26%

    $5,358

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HUSV 0.70%
  • TOAK 0.26%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530HUSV $13,606TOAK $5,358

Year by year

YearHUSVTOAKOverpaying
10$1,250$473$777
20$4,760$1,838$2,922
30$13,606$5,358$8,248

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%HUSV
  • 0.26%TOAK, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
  • Median 0.47%

TOAK 2nd cheapest of 10 funds

HUSV 7th cheapest of 10 funds

HUSV vs TOAK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HUSV 1.40%
TOAK No data
Payout (12M)
HUSV $0.59
TOAK None
Last payment
HUSV $0.19
TOAK No data
Ex-dividend
HUSV Sep 24, 2026
TOAK No data
Paid on
HUSV Sep 30, 2026
TOAK No data
Frequency
HUSV Quarterly
TOAK No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

HUSVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll HUSV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2017 $0.07; Jun 22, 2017 $0.08; Sep 21, 2017 $0.07; Dec 21, 2017 $0.09; Mar 22, 2018 $0.06; Jun 21, 2018 $0.09; Sep 14, 2018 $0.05; Dec 18, 2018 $0.14; Mar 21, 2019 $0.06; Jun 14, 2019 $0.08; Sep 25, 2019 $0.13; Dec 13, 2019 $0.12; Mar 26, 2020 $0.08; Jun 25, 2020 $0.08; Sep 24, 2020 $0.07; Dec 24, 2020 $0.14; Mar 25, 2021 $0.12; Jun 24, 2021 $0.11; Sep 23, 2021 $0.10; Dec 23, 2021 $0.16; Mar 25, 2022 $0.11; Jun 24, 2022 $0.11; Sep 23, 2022 $0.18; Dec 23, 2022 $0.16; Mar 24, 2023 $0.16; Jun 27, 2023 $0.11; Sep 22, 2023 $0.14; Dec 22, 2023 $0.19; Mar 21, 2024 $0.06; Jun 27, 2024 $0.10; Sep 26, 2024 $0.11; Dec 13, 2024 $0.15; Mar 27, 2025 $0.12; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.13; Dec 12, 2025 $0.17; Mar 26, 2026 $0.12; Jun 25, 2026 $0.11; Sep 24, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
TOAKAll TOAK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

HUSV vs TOAK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HUSV 11.2%TOAK 0.3%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HUSV 0.68TOAK −0.72since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HUSV −17.0%TOAK −1.8%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HUSV 0.45TOAK 0.0003

HUSV and TOAK in the news

Popular comparisons

  • HUSVCvsSELVA

    First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF · SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsSELVA

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HUSVCvsCGCVA

    First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF · Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsCGCVA

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HUSVCvsLOWVB

    First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF · AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsLOWVB

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.