SELV ranks 1st and HUSV 6th of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.
HUSV vs SELV
SELV −0.55pt a year
0.70%0.15%
HUSV 1.1×the volume
15.9K14.8K
SELV +4.5pt
+12.0%+16.5%
HUSV vs SELV Performance
+11.0%+18.4%
- HUSV 0.70%
- SELV 0.15%, better
- HUSV $57M
- SELV $271M
- HUSV +11.0%
- SELV +18.4%, better
- HUSV 1.40%
- SELV 1.62%, better
- HUSV 101
- SELV 77
- HUSV 15.9K sh, better
- SELV 14.8K sh
- HUSV $41.96
- SELV $36.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HUSV | SELV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A95Higher |
| Mission | C40 | |
| Risk | B60 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | A72 |
| Durability | B63 | B69Higher |
Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds
Same Category. HUSV and SELV are both graded against the same 10 US Active Low Volatility funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HUSVC
SELVA
In short
HUSV Most low-vol funds rank stocks on the calm they already showed. HUSV pays Horizon Investments to forecast it instead, then weights hardest toward the names its models expect to move least.
SELV Active low-volatility large cap at index-fund pricing. SEI scores Russell 1000 names on volatility, momentum, quality and value, then holds roughly 90 of them, aiming for a smoother ride than the broad U.S. large-cap market.
Stated mandate
HUSV The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in domestic common stocks that the sub-advisor expects to have relatively low volatility.
SELV The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while targeting lower volatility than the broad U.S. large-cap equity market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HUSV vs SELV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HUSV vs SELV Cost
Overpaying HUSV vs SELV
$10,469
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HUSV 0.70%
$13,606
SELV 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HUSV | SELV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $274 | $976 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $1,071 | $3,689 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $3,137 | $10,469 |
- 0.70%HUSV
- 0.15%SELV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
- Median 0.47%
SELV cheapest of 10 funds
HUSV 7th cheapest of 10 funds
HUSV vs SELV Dividends
- HUSV 1.40%
- SELV 1.62%, better
- HUSV $0.59
- SELV $0.59
- HUSV $0.19
- SELV $0.14
- HUSV Sep 24, 2026
- SELV Oct 5, 2026
- HUSV Sep 30, 2026
- SELV Oct 6, 2026
- HUSV Quarterly
- SELV Quarterly
Distribution history
HUSV vs SELV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HUSV 11.2%SELV 10.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HUSV 0.68SELV 1.10, better
- Worst fall
- HUSV −17.0%SELV −13.7%
- Market sensitivity
- HUSV 0.45SELV 0.45Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
HUSV and SELV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

