IBMO ranks 4th and MYMJ 28th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMO vs MYMJ
IBMO −0.10pt a year
0.10%0.20%
IBMO 79.7×the volume
82.4K1.04K
IBMO vs MYMJ Performance
+2.7%+0.7%
- IBMO 0.10%, better
- MYMJ 0.20%
- IBMO $503M
- MYMJ $13M
- IBMO +2.7%, better
- MYMJ +0.7%
- IBMO 2.41%
- MYMJ 2.93%, better
- IBMO 295
- MYMJ 100
- IBMO 82.4K sh, better
- MYMJ 1.04K sh
- IBMO $25.66
- MYMJ $24.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMO | MYMJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | F17 |
| Holdings | F21 | C40Higher |
| Durability | A94Higher | C47 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMO and MYMJ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMOA
MYMJF
In short
MYMJ A bond fund with a finish line. MYMJ holds roughly 100 municipal bonds maturing around 2030, pays monthly along the way, then distributes remaining principal and winds down around December 15, 2030.
Stated mandate
MYMJ The fund is actively managed and targets municipal bonds maturing primarily in 2030. It is designed to distribute remaining principal and liquidate around December 15, 2030.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMO vs MYMJ Holdings
How IBMO and MYMJ differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for IBMO and MYMJ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IBMOMore in MYMJ | IBMO | MYMJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- IBMO44.2%
- MYMJ23.8%
- IBMO201
- MYMJ97
Asset class
- IBMO
- Fixed Income
- MYMJ
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. IBMO holds 201 securities, MYMJ 97.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMO vs MYMJ Cost
Overpaying MYMJ vs IBMO
$2,049
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMO 0.10%
$2,106
MYMJ 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMO | MYMJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $365 | $182 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,421 | $704 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $4,155 | $2,049 |
- 0.10%IBMO, cheaper
- 0.20%MYMJ
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMO cheapest of 32 funds
MYMJ 27th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMO vs MYMJ Dividends
- IBMO 2.41%
- MYMJ 2.93%, better
- IBMO $0.62
- MYMJ $0.71
- IBMO $0.06
- MYMJ $0.06
- IBMO Oct 1, 2026
- MYMJ Oct 1, 2026
- IBMO Oct 6, 2026
- MYMJ Oct 6, 2026
- IBMO Monthly
- MYMJ Monthly
Distribution history
IBMO vs MYMJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMO 1.6%MYMJ 3.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMO −0.66MYMJ −0.64
- Worst fall
- IBMO −8.3%MYMJ −3.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMO 0.27MYMJ 0.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.