IBMP ranks 1st and MYMJ 28th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMP vs MYMJ
IBMP −0.10pt a year
0.10%0.20%
IBMP 101.1×the volume
105K1.04K
IBMP vs MYMJ Performance
+2.4%+0.7%
- IBMP 0.10%, better
- MYMJ 0.20%
- IBMP $685M
- MYMJ $13M
- IBMP +2.4%, better
- MYMJ +0.7%
- IBMP 2.53%
- MYMJ 2.93%, better
- IBMP 1859
- MYMJ 100
- IBMP 105K sh, better
- MYMJ 1.04K sh
- IBMP $25.35
- MYMJ $24.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMP | MYMJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | F17 |
| Holdings | A96Higher | C40 |
| Durability | A94Higher | C47 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMP and MYMJ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMPA
MYMJF
In short
IBMP A single rung of a muni ladder in one ticker: investment-grade bonds that all mature in 2027, tax-exempt income paid monthly along the way, and a defined end date instead of a fund that rolls on forever.
MYMJ A bond fund with a finish line. MYMJ holds roughly 100 municipal bonds maturing around 2030, pays monthly along the way, then distributes remaining principal and winds down around December 15, 2030.
Stated mandate
IBMP The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2027. It is designed to provide tax-exempt income, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
MYMJ The fund is actively managed and targets municipal bonds maturing primarily in 2030. It is designed to distribute remaining principal and liquidate around December 15, 2030.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMP vs MYMJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMP vs MYMJ Cost
Overpaying MYMJ vs IBMP
$2,049
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMP 0.10%
$2,106
MYMJ 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMP | MYMJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $365 | $182 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,421 | $704 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $4,155 | $2,049 |
- 0.10%IBMP, cheaper
- 0.20%MYMJ
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMP cheapest of 32 funds
MYMJ 27th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMP vs MYMJ Dividends
- IBMP 2.53%
- MYMJ 2.93%, better
- IBMP $0.64
- MYMJ $0.71
- IBMP $0.06
- MYMJ $0.06
- IBMP Oct 1, 2026
- MYMJ Oct 1, 2026
- IBMP Oct 6, 2026
- MYMJ Oct 6, 2026
- IBMP Monthly
- MYMJ Monthly
Distribution history
IBMP vs MYMJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMP 2.3%MYMJ 3.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMP −0.33MYMJ −0.64
- Worst fall
- IBMP −9.4%MYMJ −3.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMP 0.40MYMJ 0.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.