IBMR ranks 3rd and MYMJ 28th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMR vs MYMJ
IBMR −0.10pt a year
0.10%0.20%
IBMR 101.9×the volume
105K1.04K
IBMR vs MYMJ Performance
+1.6%+0.7%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- MYMJ 0.20%
- IBMR $527M
- MYMJ $13M
- IBMR +1.6%, better
- MYMJ +0.7%
- IBMR 2.54%
- MYMJ 2.93%, better
- IBMR 2071
- MYMJ 100
- IBMR 105K sh, better
- MYMJ 1.04K sh
- IBMR $25.16
- MYMJ $24.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMR | MYMJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | C54Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | F17 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C40 |
| Durability | A85Higher | C47 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMR and MYMJ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMRA
MYMJF
In short
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
MYMJ A bond fund with a finish line. MYMJ holds roughly 100 municipal bonds maturing around 2030, pays monthly along the way, then distributes remaining principal and winds down around December 15, 2030.
Stated mandate
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
MYMJ The fund is actively managed and targets municipal bonds maturing primarily in 2030. It is designed to distribute remaining principal and liquidate around December 15, 2030.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMR vs MYMJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMR vs MYMJ Cost
Overpaying MYMJ vs IBMR
$2,049
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
MYMJ 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMR | MYMJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $365 | $182 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,421 | $704 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $4,155 | $2,049 |
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- 0.20%MYMJ
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
MYMJ 27th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMR vs MYMJ Dividends
- IBMR 2.54%
- MYMJ 2.93%, better
- IBMR $0.64
- MYMJ $0.71
- IBMR $0.05
- MYMJ $0.06
- IBMR Oct 1, 2026
- MYMJ Oct 1, 2026
- IBMR Oct 6, 2026
- MYMJ Oct 6, 2026
- IBMR Monthly
- MYMJ Monthly
Distribution history
IBMR vs MYMJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMR 4.4%MYMJ 3.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMR 0.02MYMJ −0.64
- Worst fall
- IBMR −4.8%MYMJ −3.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMR 0.75MYMJ 0.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.