IBMQ ranks 2nd and MYMJ 28th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMQ vs MYMJ
IBMQ −0.10pt a year
0.10%0.20%
IBMQ 124.3×the volume
129K1.04K
IBMQ vs MYMJ Performance
+2.2%+0.7%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- MYMJ 0.20%
- IBMQ $691M
- MYMJ $13M
- IBMQ +2.2%, better
- MYMJ +0.7%
- IBMQ 2.48%
- MYMJ 2.93%, better
- IBMQ 2957
- MYMJ 100
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- MYMJ 1.04K sh
- IBMQ $25.44
- MYMJ $24.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMQ | MYMJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B58Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | F17 |
| Holdings | A94Higher | C40 |
| Durability | A95Higher | C47 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMQ and MYMJ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMQA
MYMJF
In short
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
MYMJ A bond fund with a finish line. MYMJ holds roughly 100 municipal bonds maturing around 2030, pays monthly along the way, then distributes remaining principal and winds down around December 15, 2030.
Stated mandate
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
MYMJ The fund is actively managed and targets municipal bonds maturing primarily in 2030. It is designed to distribute remaining principal and liquidate around December 15, 2030.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMQ vs MYMJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMQ vs MYMJ Cost
Overpaying MYMJ vs IBMQ
$2,049
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
MYMJ 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMQ | MYMJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $365 | $182 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,421 | $704 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $4,155 | $2,049 |
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- 0.20%MYMJ
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
MYMJ 27th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMQ vs MYMJ Dividends
- IBMQ 2.48%
- MYMJ 2.93%, better
- IBMQ $0.63
- MYMJ $0.71
- IBMQ $0.06
- MYMJ $0.06
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- MYMJ Oct 1, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- MYMJ Oct 6, 2026
- IBMQ Monthly
- MYMJ Monthly
Distribution history
IBMQ vs MYMJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMQ 3.3%MYMJ 3.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMQ −0.14MYMJ −0.64
- Worst fall
- IBMQ −10.8%MYMJ −3.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMQ 0.54MYMJ 0.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.