ICLN ranks 1st and PBD 13th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
ICLN vs PBD
ICLN −0.37pt a year
0.38%0.75%
ICLN 61.2×the volume
6.25M102K
ICLN +1.9pt
+7.4%+5.5%
ICLN vs PBD Performance
−35.2%−46.3%
- ICLN 0.38%, better
- PBD 0.75%
- ICLN $1.94B
- PBD $97M
- ICLN −10.6%
- PBD −8.7%, better
- ICLN 1.20%
- PBD 1.71%, better
- ICLN 124
- PBD 115
- ICLN 6.25M sh, better
- PBD 102K sh
- ICLN $15.35
- PBD $15.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICLN | PBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F7 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | B59 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A92Higher | B69 |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. ICLN and PBD are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICLNA
PBDD
In short
ICLN The big, global way to own the energy transition: since 2008, ICLN has tracked roughly 100 clean-power companies across developed and emerging markets, charging 0.38% a year, below the typical clean-energy fee.
PBD The 2007 original in global clean energy: about 110 names spanning cleaner generation, conservation and efficiency worldwide, reshuffled every quarter. Broader than the cap-weighted giants, and priced at 0.75% for that reach.
Stated mandate
ICLN The fund seeks to track an index representing global equities in the clean energy sector.
PBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. That index targets companies worldwide involved in cleaner energy, conservation, efficiency, renewable energy, and related technologies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICLN vs PBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICLN vs PBD Cost
Overpaying PBD vs ICLN
$6,776
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICLN 0.38%
$7,706
PBD 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICLN | PBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $1,336 | $648 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $5,078 | $2,420 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $14,482 | $6,776 |
- 0.38%ICLN, cheaper
- 0.75%PBD
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
ICLN cheapest of 16 funds
PBD 15th cheapest of 16 funds
ICLN vs PBD Dividends
- ICLN 1.20%
- PBD 1.71%, better
- ICLN $0.18
- PBD $0.26
- ICLN $0.06
- PBD $0.07
- ICLN Jun 15, 2026
- PBD Sep 21, 2026
- ICLN Jun 18, 2026
- PBD Sep 25, 2026
- ICLN Twice a year
- PBD Quarterly
Distribution history
ICLN vs PBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ICLN
- PBD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICLN 27.3%PBD 26.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ICLN 0.22, betterPBD 0.19
- Worst fall
- ICLN −57.1%, betterPBD −69.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ICLN 1.49PBD 1.62
ICLN and PBD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

