IBAT ranks 4th and PBD 13th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
IBAT vs PBD
IBAT −0.28pt a year
0.47%0.75%
PBD 4.3×the volume
23.8K102K
IBAT vs PBD Performance
+13.3%−8.7%
- IBAT 0.47%, better
- PBD 0.75%
- IBAT $56M
- PBD $97M
- IBAT +13.3%, better
- PBD −8.7%
- IBAT 0.84%
- PBD 1.71%, better
- IBAT 97
- PBD 115
- IBAT 23.8K sh
- PBD 102K sh, better
- IBAT $35.92
- PBD $15.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBAT | PBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F7 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A73Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | D37 | C46Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | A89Higher |
| Durability | D36 | B69Higher |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. IBAT and PBD are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBATB
PBDD
In short
IBAT Most EV funds buy carmakers. IBAT drops a layer down the supply chain to the batteries, hydrogen, fuel cells and storage materials underneath, tracking a global STOXX index at a fee that undercuts much of its thematic peer group.
PBD The 2007 original in global clean energy: about 110 names spanning cleaner generation, conservation and efficiency worldwide, reshuffled every quarter. Broader than the cap-weighted giants, and priced at 0.75% for that reach.
Stated mandate
IBAT The fund seeks to track an index of global companies involved in battery technologies, hydrogen, fuel cells, and other energy-storage solutions. It provides targeted exposure to companies supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy.
PBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. That index targets companies worldwide involved in cleaner energy, conservation, efficiency, renewable energy, and related technologies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBAT vs PBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBAT vs PBD Cost
Overpaying PBD vs IBAT
$5,064
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBAT 0.47%
$9,418
PBD 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBAT | PBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,336 | $489 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $5,078 | $1,817 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $14,482 | $5,064 |
- 0.47%IBAT, cheaper
- 0.75%PBD
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
IBAT 4th cheapest of 16 funds
PBD 15th cheapest of 16 funds
IBAT vs PBD Dividends
- IBAT 0.84%
- PBD 1.71%, better
- IBAT $0.30
- PBD $0.26
- IBAT $0.18
- PBD $0.07
- IBAT Jun 15, 2026
- PBD Sep 21, 2026
- IBAT Jun 18, 2026
- PBD Sep 25, 2026
- IBAT Twice a year
- PBD Quarterly
Distribution history
IBAT vs PBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBAT 30.2%PBD 26.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBAT 0.48PBD 0.19
- Worst fall
- IBAT −28.2%PBD −69.1%
- Market sensitivity
- IBAT 1.57PBD 1.62
IBAT and PBD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
