Skip to content

FRNW vs PBD

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

FRNWACboe

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF

PBDDNYSE Arca

Overlap

27.2%by weight

Expense ratio

FRNW −0.36pt a year

FRNW0.39%PBD0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

PBD 1.4×the volume

FRNW72.2KPBD102K

5Y return · a year

FRNW +5.4pt

FRNW−6.3%PBD−11.7%

FRNW vs PBD Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−27.8%FRNW−46.3%PBD

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FRNW −27.8%. PBD −46.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FRNW 0.39%, better
PBD 0.75%
Fund size
FRNW $91M
PBD $97M
1Y total return
FRNW −5.9%, better
PBD −8.7%
Yield (12M)
FRNW 1.23%
PBD 1.71%, better
Holdings
FRNW 66
PBD 115
Avg volume (30D)
FRNW 72.2K sh
PBD 102K sh, better
NAV per share
FRNW $19.96
PBD $15.02
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FRNW: Cost 93, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 83, Durability 48. PBD: Cost 7, Risk 50, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for FRNW, PBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFRNWPBD
Cost30% weightA93HigherF7
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherC50
Tradability15% weightB65HigherC46
Holdings10% weightA83A89Higher
Durability5% weightC48B69Higher

Rank among Clean Energy funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FRNW and PBD are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Clean Energy⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

FRNW ranks 2nd and PBD 13th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.

  1. Rank 1AICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFRNWFidelity Clean Energy ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3BCNRGState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 12CCTECGlobal X CleanTech ETFScore 43
  5. Rank 13DPBDInvesco Global Clean Energy ETFScore 38
  6. Rank 14DTANInvesco Solar ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FRNWAFidelity Clean Energy ETF

PBDDInvesco Global Clean Energy ETF

In short

FRNW Fidelity wrote its own clean energy index, then priced the fund at 0.39% a year, matching the category's cheapest heavyweights and undercutting most rivals. Roughly 60 global stocks: solar, wind, and the grid gear behind them.

PBD The 2007 original in global clean energy: about 110 names spanning cleaner generation, conservation and efficiency worldwide, reshuffled every quarter. Broader than the cap-weighted giants, and priced at 0.75% for that reach.

Stated mandate

FRNW The fund seeks returns that generally track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses.

PBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. That index targets companies worldwide involved in cleaner energy, conservation, efficiency, renewable energy, and related technologies.

Why people hold it

  • FRNW 0.39% a year ties the low-cost leader of the group (ICLN) and comes in under CNRG at 0.45% and FAN at 0.61%. In a theme where fees often run higher, that is real money kept.
  • Global by mandate, not US-only. The index reaches clean energy companies worldwide, so the fund follows the industry rather than one country's subsidy calendar.
  • A plain index fund, not a stock-picking bet: it aims to track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees, so what you own is spelled out in the methodology.
  • One of the stronger builds in a crowded clean energy shelf on our review, with the low fee and a spread-out portfolio doing the heavy lifting. Pays quarterly.
  • PBD Launched in 2007, a year ahead of ICLN, the category's biggest name. It has traded through a full clean-energy boom and bust with the same index behind it.ishares.com
  • About 110 holdings across cleaner energy, conservation and efficiency, held worldwide via ADRs and GDRs where needed. No single stock carries the fund.invesco.com
  • The index is rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly, so the basket refreshes with the theme rather than drifting toward whatever already won.invesco.com

Worth knowing

  • FRNW One theme, one industry. Clean energy names swing with interest rates, policy shifts, and equipment prices, so the ride is far choppier than a broad market fund.
  • Roughly 60 stocks. That is focused enough that a handful of names and a couple of countries carry real weight in the outcome.
  • Not one of the giants. A mid-size asset base and moderate trading activity can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the category's most heavily traded funds.
  • PBD At 0.75% a year it runs above the clean-energy median (0.59%) and near double ICLN and FRNW at 0.39%. The broad global basket is not the cheap way in.
  • A smaller, moderately traded fund rather than one of the category's heavyweights, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the largest names in the group.
  • One narrow global theme, tilted away from mega-caps and sensitive to policy and rates. Swings are larger than a broad world index fund's.

Full FRNW profile⁠

Full PBD profile⁠

FRNW vs PBD Holdings

How FRNW and PBD differ

Overlap by weight

27.2%

Shared holdings make up 57.4% of FRNW and 27.4% of PBD.

Level by level

  • Holdings30 in both27.2%
  • Countryby domicile61.6%
  • Sector7 Sectors70.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FRNW and PBD, widest gap first
SectorMore in FRNWMore in PBD
UtilitiesFRNW +27.9 points
Consumer DiscretionaryPBD +11.8 points
IndustrialsPBD +11.0 points
MaterialsPBD +4.3 points
TechnologyFRNW +1.8 points
FinancialsPBD +1.7 points
Consumer StaplesPBD +0.9 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FRNW and PBD, widest gap first
CountryMore in FRNWMore in PBD
United StatesFRNW +15.2 points
TaiwanPBD +11.7 points
South KoreaPBD +7.5 points
DenmarkFRNW +4.6 points
PortugalFRNW +4.2 points
JapanPBD +4.2 points
GermanyFRNW +3.4 points
New ZealandFRNW +2.8 points
Other countries (18)PBD +6.8 points

Outside the US: FRNW 72% developed, 28% emerging. PBD 51% developed, 49% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FRNW43.4%
  • PBD12.5%

Securities held

  • FRNW55
  • PBD111

Asset class

FRNW
Equity
PBD
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FRNW25
  • In both30
  • Only in PBD81

Only in FRNW

25 securities, 51.4% of FRNW by weight

  • Securities Lending Cf8.92%
  • Ge Vernova Inc4.64%
  • Edp S.a.4.16%

Only in PBD

81 securities, 72.5% of PBD by weight

  • SES AI Corp1.64%
  • Lotte Energy Materials Corp1.44%
  • Nibe Industrier AB1.25%

Weight gaps

All 30 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FRNW and PBD, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FRNWMore in PBD
Bloom Energy Corp Class ABEFRNW +3.27 points
Vestas Wind Systems AsFRNW +3.26 points
First Solar IncFSLRFRNW +3.19 points
Enlight Renewable Energy LtdFRNW +2.29 points
Orsted A/SFRNW +2.20 points
Verbund AGFRNW +1.81 points
Nordex SEFRNW +1.69 points
Ormat Technologies IncORAFRNW +1.66 points

All 65 FRNW holdings⁠All 110 PBD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FRNW vs PBD Cost

Overpaying PBD vs FRNW

$6,584

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FRNW 0.39%

    $7,898

  • PBD 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FRNW 0.39%
  • PBD 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PBD $14,482FRNW $7,898

Year by year

YearFRNWPBDOverpaying
10$705$1,336$631
20$2,725$5,078$2,353
30$7,898$14,482$6,584

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%FRNW, cheaper
  • 0.75%PBD
  • Middle half of Clean Energy funds
  • Median 0.59%

FRNW 2nd cheapest of 16 funds

PBD 15th cheapest of 16 funds

FRNW vs PBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FRNW 1.23%
PBD 1.71%, better
Payout (12M)
FRNW $0.24
PBD $0.26
Last payment
FRNW $0.05
PBD $0.07
Ex-dividend
FRNW Sep 18, 2026
PBD Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
FRNW Sep 22, 2026
PBD Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
FRNW Quarterly
PBD Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FRNWQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll FRNW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2021 $0.01; Mar 18, 2022 $0.02; Jun 17, 2022 $0.09; Sep 16, 2022 $0.03; Dec 16, 2022 $0.01; Mar 17, 2023 $0.03; Jun 16, 2023 $0.10; Sep 15, 2023 $0.07; Dec 15, 2023 $0.03; Mar 15, 2024 $0.02; Jun 21, 2024 $0.10; Sep 20, 2024 $0.06; Dec 20, 2024 $0.02; Mar 21, 2025 $0.01; Jun 20, 2025 $0.12; Sep 19, 2025 $0.08; Dec 19, 2025 $0.04; Mar 20, 2026 $0.02; Jun 18, 2026 $0.14; Sep 18, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
PBDQuarterly · 36 paymentsAll PBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 36 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.06; Sep 18, 2017 $0.05; Dec 18, 2017 $0.12; Jun 18, 2018 $0.05; Sep 24, 2018 $0.05; Dec 24, 2018 $0.10; Mar 18, 2019 $0.02; Jun 24, 2019 $0.06; Sep 23, 2019 $0.07; Dec 23, 2019 $0.12; Mar 23, 2020 $0.03; Jun 22, 2020 $0.04; Sep 21, 2020 $0.07; Dec 21, 2020 $0.02; Jun 21, 2021 $0.07; Sep 20, 2021 $0.06; Dec 20, 2021 $0.06; Mar 21, 2022 $0.06; Jun 21, 2022 $0.11; Sep 19, 2022 $0.08; Dec 19, 2022 $0.30; Mar 20, 2023 $0.08; Jun 20, 2023 $0.14; Sep 18, 2023 $0.04; Dec 18, 2023 $0.19; Mar 18, 2024 $0.0066; Jun 24, 2024 $0.09; Sep 23, 2024 $0.07; Dec 23, 2024 $0.04; Mar 24, 2025 $0.09; Jun 23, 2025 $0.14; Sep 22, 2025 $0.12; Dec 22, 2025 $0.09; Mar 23, 2026 $0.02; Jun 22, 2026 $0.08; Sep 21, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FRNW vs PBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FRNW
  • PBD
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PBD −69.1% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FRNW 27.0%PBD 26.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FRNW 0.44, betterPBD 0.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FRNW −59.4%, betterPBD −69.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FRNW 1.53PBD 1.62

Popular comparisons

  • FRNWAvsICLNA

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBDDvsICLNA

    Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsCNRGB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBDDvsCNRGB

    Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsIBATB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBDDvsIBATB

    Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF · iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.