CNRG ranks 3rd and PBD 13th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
CNRG vs PBD
CNRG −0.30pt a year
0.45%0.75%
PBD 11.3×the volume
9.06K102K
CNRG +6.0pt
−5.7%−11.7%
CNRG vs PBD Performance
−25.4%−46.3%
- CNRG 0.45%, better
- PBD 0.75%
- CNRG $163M
- PBD $97M
- CNRG −23.2%
- PBD −8.7%, better
- CNRG 1.66%
- PBD 1.71%, better
- CNRG 40
- PBD 115
- CNRG 9.06K sh
- PBD 102K sh, better
- CNRG $78.65
- PBD $15.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNRG | PBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F7 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34 | C50Higher |
| Tradability | B57Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A79 | A89Higher |
| Durability | B67 | B69Higher |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. CNRG and PBD are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNRGB
PBDD
In short
CNRG A focused read on clean power: about 40 global stocks tracked to an S&P Kensho index, at a fee below the clean-energy midpoint. Small fund, sharp mandate, one of the stronger builds in the theme.
PBD The 2007 original in global clean energy: about 110 names spanning cleaner generation, conservation and efficiency worldwide, reshuffled every quarter. Broader than the cap-weighted giants, and priced at 0.75% for that reach.
Stated mandate
CNRG The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index before fees and expenses.
PBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. That index targets companies worldwide involved in cleaner energy, conservation, efficiency, renewable energy, and related technologies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNRG vs PBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNRG vs PBD Cost
Overpaying PBD vs CNRG
$5,441
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNRG 0.45%
$9,041
PBD 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNRG | PBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,336 | $524 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,078 | $1,950 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,482 | $5,441 |
- 0.45%CNRG, cheaper
- 0.75%PBD
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
CNRG 3rd cheapest of 16 funds
PBD 15th cheapest of 16 funds
CNRG vs PBD Dividends
- CNRG 1.66%
- PBD 1.71%, better
- CNRG $1.27
- PBD $0.26
- CNRG $0.36
- PBD $0.07
- CNRG Sep 21, 2026
- PBD Sep 21, 2026
- CNRG Sep 23, 2026
- PBD Sep 25, 2026
- CNRG Quarterly
- PBD Quarterly
Distribution history
CNRG vs PBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CNRG
- PBD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNRG 34.4%PBD 26.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CNRG 0.31, betterPBD 0.19
- Worst fall
- CNRG −59.2%, betterPBD −69.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CNRG 1.87PBD 1.62
CNRG and PBD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
