Skip to content

ICOP vs PRNT

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

ICOPBNasdaq

The 3D Printing ETF

PRNTDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ICOP −0.19pt a year

ICOP0.47%PRNT0.66%

Avg volume · 30D

ICOP 15.4×the volume

ICOP99.1KPRNT6.46K

3Y return · a year

ICOP +26.4pt

ICOP+35.0%PRNT+8.6%

ICOP vs PRNT Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+32.7%ICOP+8.5%PRNT

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. ICOP +32.7%. PRNT +8.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%60%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ICOP 0.47%, better
PRNT 0.66%
Fund size
ICOP $397M
PRNT $61M
1Y total return
ICOP +32.7%, better
PRNT +8.5%
Yield (12M)
ICOP 1.81%, better
PRNT 0.72%
Holdings
ICOP 80
PRNT 44
Avg volume (30D)
ICOP 99.1K sh, better
PRNT 6.46K sh
NAV per share
ICOP $46.93
PRNT $23.67
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ICOP: Cost 82, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 80, Holdings 41, Durability 77. PRNT: Cost 35, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings not scored, Durability 72.
Pillar letters and Scores for ICOP, PRNT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarICOPPRNT
Cost30% weightA82HigherD35
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC43C46Higher
Tradability15% weightA80HigherD29
Holdings10% weightC41Not scored
Durability5% weightA77HigherA72

Rank among Global Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ICOP and PRNT are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

ICOP ranks 3rd and PRNT 13th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
  4. Rank 3BWRNDNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 11COPPGWisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities FundScore 40
  6. Rank 13DPRNTThe 3D Printing ETFScore 39
  7. Rank 14DCOPPSprott Copper Miners ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ICOPBiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

PRNTDThe 3D Printing ETF

In short

ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.

PRNT A pure bet on 3D printing: roughly 60 printer makers, software firms and materials suppliers across the US, Taiwan and developed markets, followed by index rather than picked by a manager. Trading since 2016.

Stated mandate

ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.

PRNT The Fund seeks to closely match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Total 3D-Printing Index. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the Index by holding its securities in approximately the same proportions.

Why people hold it

  • ICOP At 0.47% a year it is the cheapest fund in the copper-mining cohort, undercutting COPX (0.65%), COPP (0.66%), COPJ (0.75%) and KCOP (0.99%), and sitting below the group's 0.66% median.
  • A rules-based pure play: it follows the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, holding companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining. Miners' shares, not copper futures, and no stock-picking.ishares.com
  • Global by mandate, not by accident: the index reaches U.S. and non-U.S. miners, which is where much of the world's copper actually trades. Distributions are paid quarterly.ishares.com
  • One of the stronger builds in a small copper-mining field, pairing the lowest fee in the group with a mainstream iShares index wrapper.
  • PRNT Whole-portfolio exposure to one theme. No mega-cap ballast diluting the story, just roughly 60 names tied to the 3D printing chain across the US, Taiwan and developed markets.ark-funds.com
  • Rules first, hunches never. It tracks the Total 3D-Printing Index, so holdings come from published methodology instead of a manager's conviction.ark-funds.com
  • Launched in 2016, a long run for a theme this narrow. Plenty of thematic funds never see a full market cycle.

Worth knowing

  • ICOP Non-diversified by design: a few dozen miners levered to one metal, with the largest names carrying a big slice. Copper prices and mine-level news drive the ride.ishares.com
  • A large share of the basket is listed outside the U.S., so currency moves and foreign market risks come along with the copper exposure.ishares.com
  • It launched in 2023, so the live record is short, and trading is moderate rather than heavy. Limit orders earn their keep on bigger tickets.
  • PRNT At 0.66% a year, it costs more than the typical global thematic fund. Narrow niches rarely come cheap.
  • Modest asset base and light trading. Spreads can widen, so limit orders matter more here than in a mega-cap index fund.
  • One theme, roughly 60 stocks, many of them small industrials. Swings run bigger than a broad equity fund's, in both directions.

Full ICOP profile⁠

Full PRNT profile⁠

ICOP vs PRNT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ICOP vs PRNT Cost

Overpaying PRNT vs ICOP

$3,478

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ICOP 0.47%

    $9,418

  • PRNT 0.66%

    $12,896

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ICOP 0.47%
  • PRNT 0.66%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PRNT $12,896ICOP $9,418

Year by year

YearICOPPRNTOverpaying
10$847$1,180$333
20$3,261$4,504$1,243
30$9,418$12,896$3,478

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%ICOP, cheaper
  • 0.66%PRNT
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds

PRNT 12th cheapest of 18 funds

ICOP vs PRNT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
ICOP 1.81%, better
PRNT 0.72%
Payout (12M)
ICOP $0.89
PRNT $0.17
Last payment
ICOP $0.27
PRNT $0.17
Ex-dividend
ICOP Jun 15, 2026
PRNT Dec 26, 2025
Paid on
ICOP Jun 18, 2026
PRNT Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
ICOP Twice a year
PRNT Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ICOPTwice a year · 7 paymentsAll ICOP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.55; Jun 11, 2024 $0.05; Dec 17, 2024 $0.42; Jun 16, 2025 $0.30; Dec 16, 2025 $0.59; Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Jun 15, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
PRNTAnnual · 6 paymentsAll PRNT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.53; Dec 27, 2018 $0.16; Dec 27, 2019 $0.02; Dec 29, 2021 $0.00057; Dec 27, 2024 $0.11; Dec 26, 2025 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

ICOP vs PRNT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ICOP 30.3%PRNT 22.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ICOP 0.93, betterPRNT 0.37
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ICOP −38.6%since Jun 2023PRNT −56.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ICOP 1.34PRNT 1.70

Popular comparisons

  • ICOPBvsFITEA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PRNTDvsFITEA

    The 3D Printing ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsAGNGA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PRNTDvsAGNGA

    The 3D Printing ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsWRNDB

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PRNTDvsWRNDB

    The 3D Printing ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.