ICOP ranks 3rd and PRNT 13th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
ICOP vs PRNT
ICOP −0.19pt a year
0.47%0.66%
ICOP 15.4×the volume
99.1K6.46K
ICOP +26.4pt
+35.0%+8.6%
ICOP vs PRNT Performance
+32.7%+8.5%
- ICOP 0.47%, better
- PRNT 0.66%
- ICOP $397M
- PRNT $61M
- ICOP +32.7%, better
- PRNT +8.5%
- ICOP 1.81%, better
- PRNT 0.72%
- ICOP 80
- PRNT 44
- ICOP 99.1K sh, better
- PRNT 6.46K sh
- ICOP $46.93
- PRNT $23.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICOP | PRNT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | C41 | |
| Durability | A77Higher | A72 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. ICOP and PRNT are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICOPB
PRNTD
In short
ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.
PRNT A pure bet on 3D printing: roughly 60 printer makers, software firms and materials suppliers across the US, Taiwan and developed markets, followed by index rather than picked by a manager. Trading since 2016.
Stated mandate
ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.
PRNT The Fund seeks to closely match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Total 3D-Printing Index. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the Index by holding its securities in approximately the same proportions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICOP vs PRNT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICOP vs PRNT Cost
Overpaying PRNT vs ICOP
$3,478
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICOP 0.47%
$9,418
PRNT 0.66%
$12,896
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICOP | PRNT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,180 | $333 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $4,504 | $1,243 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $12,896 | $3,478 |
- 0.47%ICOP, cheaper
- 0.66%PRNT
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds
PRNT 12th cheapest of 18 funds
ICOP vs PRNT Dividends
- ICOP 1.81%, better
- PRNT 0.72%
- ICOP $0.89
- PRNT $0.17
- ICOP $0.27
- PRNT $0.17
- ICOP Jun 15, 2026
- PRNT Dec 26, 2025
- ICOP Jun 18, 2026
- PRNT Dec 29, 2025
- ICOP Twice a year
- PRNT Annual
Distribution history
ICOP vs PRNT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICOP 30.3%PRNT 22.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ICOP 0.93, betterPRNT 0.37
- Worst fall
- ICOP −38.6%PRNT −56.5%
- Market sensitivity
- ICOP 1.34PRNT 1.70
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.