ICOP ranks 4th and THMZ 7th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
ICOP vs THMZ
0.0%by weight
ICOP −0.03pt a year
0.47%0.50%
ICOP 48.6×the volume
97.5K2.01K
ICOP vs THMZ Performance
+23.6%+2.1%
- ICOP 0.47%, better
- THMZ 0.50%
- ICOP $408M
- THMZ $54M
- ICOP +23.6%, better
- THMZ +2.1%
- ICOP 1.91%, better
- THMZ 0.41%
- ICOP 78
- THMZ 63
- ICOP 97.5K sh, better
- THMZ 2.01K sh
- ICOP $46.95
- THMZ $33.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICOP | THMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | B67 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C40 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | A81Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | C44 | A79Higher |
| Durability | A78Higher | C47 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. ICOP and THMZ are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICOPB
THMZB
In short
ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.
THMZ Most thematic ETFs make you pick one trend and live with it. Lazard's megatrends fund is actively run across several themes at once, holding about 60 established companies worldwide and measuring itself against the global stock market.
Stated mandate
ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.
THMZ THMZ is the ticker shown for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF on NASDAQ.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICOP vs THMZ Holdings
How ICOP and THMZ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ICOP and 0.0% of THMZ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Country21.7%
Sector
No Sector split for THMZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ICOPMore in THMZ | ICOP | THMZ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | THMZ +44.9 points | 13.8% | 58.7% |
| Canada | ICOP +27.3 points | 28.4% | 1.1% |
| United Kingdom | ICOP +15.6 points | 20.1% | 4.5% |
| Australia | ICOP +12.2 points | 12.2% | 0.0% |
| Mexico | ICOP +9.3 points | 9.3% | 0.0% |
| Japan | THMZ +9.3 points | 0.0% | 9.3% |
| Taiwan | THMZ +5.5 points | 0.0% | 5.5% |
| Peru | ICOP +5.1 points | 5.1% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (12) | THMZ +9.8 points | 11.0% | 20.8% |
Outside the US: ICOP 71% developed, 29% emerging. THMZ 71% developed, 29% emerging.
Concentration
- ICOP63.2%
- THMZ31.8%
- ICOP63
- THMZ60
Asset class
- ICOP
- Equity
- THMZ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in ICOP63
- In both0
- Only in THMZ60
Only in ICOP
63 securities, 99.8% of ICOP by weight
- Grupo Mexico B8.81%
- Anglo American PLC8.77%
- Bhp Group Ltd8.47%
- Freeport Mcmoran Inc8.34%
- Teck Resources Subordinate Voting6.05%
- Newmont5.12%
- Southern Copper Corp4.89%
- Antofagasta PLC4.39%
- Lundin Mining4.30%
- First Quantum Minerals4.02%
- Glencore PLC3.19%
- Barrick Mining3.09%
- Rio Tinto Adr Reptg One3.06%
- Kghm Polska Miedz SA3.04%
- Hudbay Minerals2.95%
- Vale Adr Representing One2.24%
- Sandfire Resources2.01%
- Capstone Copper Corp1.65%
- China Gold International Resources1.59%
- Ivanhoe Mines Class A1.34%
- Mmg Ltd1.20%
- Ero Copper0.93%
- Aura Minerals Inc0.89%
- Evolution Mining0.86%
- Trekor Metals0.82%
- SOUTH320.69%
- China Nonferrous Mining Corporatio0.64%
- Ngex Minerals0.62%
- Atalaya Mining Copper SA0.48%
- Two Point Zero Group0.41%
- Indust Penoles0.39%
- Nittetsu Mining Ltd0.35%
- Zijin Mining Group Ltd A0.26%
- Amerigo Resources Ltd0.25%
- Avino Silver and Gold Mines Ltd0.22%
- Firefly Metals Ltd0.22%
- Faraday Copper Corp0.22%
- Al Masane Al Kobra Mining0.22%
- Osisko Metals Inc0.21%
- Solaris Resources0.20%
- Western Mining Ltd A0.19%
- Jiangxi Copper Ltd A0.18%
- Amman Mineral Internasional0.17%
- Northern Dynasty Minerals0.14%
- Gruvaktiebolaget Viscaria Class B0.14%
- Imperial Metals0.13%
- Marimaca Copper0.12%
- Atlas Consolidated Mining and Deve0.12%
- Aeris Resources Ltd0.11%
- China Molybdenum A0.11%
Only in THMZ
60 securities, 100% of THMZ by weight
- Taiwan Semiconductor Sp Adr5.47%
- Microsoft Corp3.92%
- Amazon.com Inc3.56%
- Applied Materials Inc3.22%
- NVIDIA Corp2.94%
- Alphabet Inc Class A2.80%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc2.67%
- Meta Platforms Inc Class A2.52%
- Keysight Technologies In2.43%
- Danaher Corp2.33%
- Apple Inc2.29%
- Broadcom Inc2.02%
- Fanuc Corp2.00%
- Eli Lilly & Co2.00%
- Astrazeneca PLC1.94%
- Advanced Micro Devices1.83%
- Hexagon Ab B Shs1.82%
- Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd1.81%
- Intercontinental Exchange In1.80%
- Moody’s Corp1.80%
- Amphenol Corp Class A1.79%
- Stryker Corp1.64%
- Visa Inc Class A Shares1.64%
- Atlas Copco Ab A Shs1.63%
- Keyence Corp1.60%
- Epiroc Ab A1.60%
- Mastercard Inc A1.59%
- Kb Financial Group Inc Adr1.56%
- Siemens AG Reg1.51%
- Qualcomm Inc1.49%
- Mercadolibre Inc1.49%
- Weir PLC1.49%
- Japan Exchange Group Inc1.43%
- Japan Post Bank Co Ltd1.42%
- Unicredit Spa1.41%
- Experian PLC1.40%
- Reliance Inds Spons Gdr 144A Gdr1.39%
- Schneider Electric SE1.38%
- Icici Bank Ltd Spon Adr1.33%
- Essilorluxottica1.27%
- Equifax Inc1.25%
- Labcorp Holdings Inc1.21%
- Uber Technologies Inc1.18%
- Micron Technology Inc1.15%
- Chubb Ltd1.13%
- Shopify Inc Class A1.12%
- Take Two Interactive Softwre1.10%
- Aia Group Ltd1.07%
- Rolls Royce Holdings PLC1.07%
- General Electric1.03%
Weight gaps
ICOP and THMZ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICOP vs THMZ Cost
Overpaying THMZ vs ICOP
$561
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICOP 0.47%
$9,418
THMZ 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICOP | THMZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $900 | $53 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $3,460 | $199 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $9,979 | $561 |
- 0.47%ICOP, cheaper
- 0.50%THMZ
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds
THMZ 7th cheapest of 18 funds
ICOP vs THMZ Dividends
- ICOP 1.91%, better
- THMZ 0.41%
- ICOP $0.89
- THMZ $0.14
- ICOP $0.27
- THMZ $0.06
- ICOP Jun 15, 2026
- THMZ Sep 18, 2026
- ICOP Jun 18, 2026
- THMZ Sep 21, 2026
- ICOP Twice a year
- THMZ Quarterly
Distribution history
ICOP vs THMZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICOP 30.3%THMZ 14.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ICOP 0.93THMZ 0.67
- Worst fall
- ICOP −38.6%THMZ −16.0%
- Market sensitivity
- ICOP 1.34THMZ 1.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.