Skip to content

ICOP vs THMZ

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

ICOPBNasdaq

Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF

THMZBNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

ICOP −0.03pt a year

ICOP0.47%THMZ0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

ICOP 48.6×the volume

ICOP97.5KTHMZ2.01K

ICOP vs THMZ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+23.6%ICOP+2.1%THMZ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ICOP +23.6%. THMZ +2.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.40%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ICOP 0.47%, better
THMZ 0.50%
Fund size
ICOP $408M
THMZ $54M
1Y total return
ICOP +23.6%, better
THMZ +2.1%
Yield (12M)
ICOP 1.91%, better
THMZ 0.41%
Holdings
ICOP 78
THMZ 63
Avg volume (30D)
ICOP 97.5K sh, better
THMZ 2.01K sh
NAV per share
ICOP $46.95
THMZ $33.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ICOP: Cost 83, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 44, Durability 78. THMZ: Cost 67, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 79, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for ICOP, THMZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarICOPTHMZ
Cost30% weightA83HigherB67
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC40C52Higher
Tradability15% weightA81HigherD27
Holdings10% weightC44A79Higher
Durability5% weightA78HigherC47

Rank among Global Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ICOP and THMZ are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

ICOP ranks 4th and THMZ 7th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BWRNDNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 5BHAILState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 6BTRFKPacer Data and Digital Revolution ETFScore 63
  7. Rank 7BTHMZLazard Equity Megatrends ETFScore 56
  8. Rank 8CCOPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ICOPBiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

THMZBLazard Equity Megatrends ETF

In short

ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.

THMZ Most thematic ETFs make you pick one trend and live with it. Lazard's megatrends fund is actively run across several themes at once, holding about 60 established companies worldwide and measuring itself against the global stock market.

Stated mandate

ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.

THMZ THMZ is the ticker shown for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF on NASDAQ.

Why people hold it

  • ICOP At 0.47% a year it is the cheapest fund in the copper-mining cohort, undercutting COPX (0.65%), COPP (0.66%), COPJ (0.75%) and KCOP (0.99%), and sitting below the group's 0.66% median.
  • A rules-based pure play: it follows the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, holding companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining. Miners' shares, not copper futures, and no stock-picking.ishares.com
  • Global by mandate, not by accident: the index reaches U.S. and non-U.S. miners, which is where much of the world's copper actually trades. Distributions are paid quarterly.ishares.com
  • One of the stronger builds in a small copper-mining field, pairing the lowest fee in the group with a mainstream iShares index wrapper.
  • THMZ Multi-theme by design: rather than one trend in a wrapper, the managers spread roughly 60 global holdings across several megatrends and let the theme mix evolve, with the MSCI All Country World Index as the yardstick.lazardassetmanagement.comlazardassetmanagement.com 2
  • 0.50% net of a fee waiver (0.60% gross) sits below the median for global thematic funds, and level with AGNG, the aging-population ETF, at 0.50%.
  • The mandate leans on established companies generally above $5 billion in market cap, emerging markets included. Blue-chip megatrends, not micro-cap moonshots.lazardassetmanagement.com
  • Portfolio construction stands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group, and the fund pays distributions quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • ICOP Non-diversified by design: a few dozen miners levered to one metal, with the largest names carrying a big slice. Copper prices and mine-level news drive the ride.ishares.com
  • A large share of the basket is listed outside the U.S., so currency moves and foreign market risks come along with the copper exposure.ishares.com
  • It launched in 2023, so the live record is short, and trading is moderate rather than heavy. Limit orders earn their keep on bigger tickets.
  • THMZ No published index sits behind it. Which megatrends make the cut, and which names express them, is the manager's call, so there is nothing external to grade the stock picking against.lazardassetmanagement.com
  • Trading is thin next to the giant index names, so the bid-ask gap can be wider and large orders need more care.
  • It launched in 2025, so the record is short, and index-tracking rivals cost less: WRND charges 0.18% net of a fee waiver.

Full ICOP profile⁠

Full THMZ profile⁠

ICOP vs THMZ Holdings

How ICOP and THMZ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ICOP and 0.0% of THMZ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile21.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for THMZ.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ICOP and THMZ, widest gap first
CountryMore in ICOPMore in THMZ
United StatesTHMZ +44.9 points
CanadaICOP +27.3 points
United KingdomICOP +15.6 points
AustraliaICOP +12.2 points
MexicoICOP +9.3 points
JapanTHMZ +9.3 points
TaiwanTHMZ +5.5 points
PeruICOP +5.1 points
Other countries (12)THMZ +9.8 points

Outside the US: ICOP 71% developed, 29% emerging. THMZ 71% developed, 29% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ICOP63.2%
  • THMZ31.8%

Securities held

  • ICOP63
  • THMZ60

Asset class

ICOP
Equity
THMZ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ICOP63
  • In both0
  • Only in THMZ60

Only in ICOP

63 securities, 99.8% of ICOP by weight

  • Grupo Mexico B8.81%
  • Anglo American PLC8.77%
  • Bhp Group Ltd8.47%

Only in THMZ

60 securities, 100% of THMZ by weight

  • Taiwan Semiconductor Sp Adr5.47%
  • Microsoft Corp3.92%
  • Amazon.com Inc3.56%

Weight gaps

ICOP and THMZ share no securities.

All 64 ICOP holdings⁠All 60 THMZ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ICOP vs THMZ Cost

Overpaying THMZ vs ICOP

$561

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ICOP 0.47%

    $9,418

  • THMZ 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ICOP 0.47%
  • THMZ 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530THMZ $9,979ICOP $9,418

Year by year

YearICOPTHMZOverpaying
10$847$900$53
20$3,261$3,460$199
30$9,418$9,979$561

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%ICOP, cheaper
  • 0.50%THMZ
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds

THMZ 7th cheapest of 18 funds

ICOP vs THMZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ICOP 1.91%, better
THMZ 0.41%
Payout (12M)
ICOP $0.89
THMZ $0.14
Last payment
ICOP $0.27
THMZ $0.06
Ex-dividend
ICOP Jun 15, 2026
THMZ Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
ICOP Jun 18, 2026
THMZ Sep 21, 2026
Frequency
ICOP Twice a year
THMZ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ICOPTwice a year · 7 paymentsAll ICOP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.55; Jun 11, 2024 $0.05; Dec 17, 2024 $0.42; Jun 16, 2025 $0.30; Dec 16, 2025 $0.59; Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Jun 15, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
THMZQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll THMZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2025 $0.10; Dec 19, 2025 $0.004; Mar 20, 2026 $0.04; Jun 18, 2026 $0.04; Sep 18, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ICOP vs THMZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ICOP 30.3%THMZ 14.2%since May 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ICOP 0.93THMZ 0.67since May 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ICOP −38.6%since Jun 2023THMZ −16.0%since Apr 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ICOP 1.34THMZ 1.09

Popular comparisons

  • ICOPBvsFITEA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMZBvsFITEA

    Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsAGNGA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMZBvsAGNGA

    Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsWRNDB

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMZBvsWRNDB

    Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.