IEO ranks 4th and UMI 9th of 10 funds in the Oil & Gas Producers Category.
IEO vs UMI
IEO −0.48pt a year
0.37%0.85%
IEO 5.0×the volume
119K23.6K
IEO +1.5pt
+22.3%+20.8%
IEO vs UMI Performance
+173.1%+156.8%
- IEO 0.37%, better
- UMI 0.85%
- IEO $937M
- UMI $557M
- IEO +72.6%, better
- UMI +36.2%
- IEO 1.45%
- UMI 5.76%, better
- IEO 49
- UMI 24
- IEO 119K sh, better
- UMI 23.6K sh
- IEO $151.11
- UMI $61.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IEO | UMI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60Higher | F14 |
| Mission | B68Higher | D25 |
| Risk | C52 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | B65Higher | F17 |
| Holdings | D36 | B66Higher |
| Durability | B67Higher | C45 |
Rank among Oil & Gas Producers funds
Same Category. IEO and UMI are both graded against the same 10 Oil & Gas Producers funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IEOB
UMID
In short
IEO One of the original ways to own U.S. upstream energy: since 2006 this iShares fund has tracked a single index of about 50 American oil and gas exploration and production stocks. Pure upstream, pure U.S.
UMI Most pipeline funds are index machines. UMI is a stock picker: sub-adviser Miller/Howard runs a concentrated book of US and Canadian midstream names, with current income as the stated first job and a payout that lands monthly.
Stated mandate
IEO The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. equities in the oil and gas exploration and production sector. It uses a sampling-based indexing approach and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in components of the Underlying Index.
UMI The Fund seeks a high level of current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation. It actively invests at least 80% of net assets in equity securities of U.S. and Canadian midstream energy companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IEO vs UMI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IEO vs UMI Cost
Overpaying UMI vs IEO
$8,686
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IEO 0.37%
$7,513
UMI 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IEO | UMI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $1,508 | $838 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $5,706 | $3,116 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $16,199 | $8,686 |
- 0.37%IEO, cheaper
- 0.85%UMI
- Middle half of Oil & Gas Producers funds
- Median 0.39%
IEO 4th cheapest of 10 funds
UMI 9th cheapest of 10 funds
IEO vs UMI Dividends
- IEO 1.45%
- UMI 5.76%, better
- IEO $2.19
- UMI $3.55
- IEO $0.49
- UMI $0.05
- IEO Sep 15, 2026
- UMI Oct 26, 2026
- IEO Sep 18, 2026
- UMI Oct 28, 2026
- IEO Quarterly
- UMI Monthly
Distribution history
IEO vs UMI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IEO
- UMI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IEO 23.9%UMI 16.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IEO 0.65UMI 1.32, better
- Worst fall
- IEO −31.4%UMI −20.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IEO −0.11UMI 0.31
IEO and UMI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
