IGF ranks 2nd and POWR 8th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IGF vs POWR
IGF −0.02pt a year
0.37%0.39%
IGF 3.9×the volume
874K223K
IGF +0.8pt
+8.2%+7.4%
IGF vs POWR Performance
+59.9%+69.4%
- IGF 0.37%, better
- POWR 0.39%
- IGF $10.9B
- POWR $444M
- IGF +11.2%, better
- POWR +4.6%
- IGF 2.93%
- POWR 6.35%, better
- IGF 89
- POWR 73
- IGF 874K sh, better
- POWR 223K sh
- IGF $65.84
- POWR $25.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IGF | POWR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | A86 |
| Mission | A85 | A85 |
| Risk | A72Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | A75 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A92Higher | A80 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. IGF and POWR are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IGFA
POWRB
In short
IGF About 80 developed-market infrastructure companies in one ticker, tracked against the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, for 0.37% a year (well under the category norm).
POWR Most infrastructure funds blend roads, ports and airports. POWR skips all that for electricity: US energy supply, generation, transmission, distribution and storage, about 70 names, at a fee below the typical infrastructure fund.
Stated mandate
IGF The Fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities focused on the infrastructure industry.
POWR The fund seeks exposure to U.S. companies involved across the power infrastructure value chain, including energy supply, generation, transmission, distribution, and storage.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGF vs POWR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGF vs POWR Cost
Overpaying POWR vs IGF
$385
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGF 0.37%
$7,513
POWR 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGF | POWR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $705 | $35 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $2,725 | $135 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $7,898 | $385 |
- 0.37%IGF, cheaper
- 0.39%POWR
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IGF 3rd cheapest of 33 funds
POWR 5th cheapest of 33 funds
IGF vs POWR Dividends
- IGF 2.93%
- POWR 6.35%, better
- IGF $1.93
- POWR $1.59
- IGF $0.93
- POWR $0.08
- IGF Jun 15, 2026
- POWR Sep 15, 2026
- IGF Jun 18, 2026
- POWR Sep 18, 2026
- IGF Twice a year
- POWR Quarterly
Distribution history
IGF vs POWR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IGF
- POWR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGF 12.4%, betterPOWR 14.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IGF 1.18, betterPOWR 0.14
- Worst fall
- IGF −20.8%, betterPOWR −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- IGF 0.62POWR 0.47
IGF and POWR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




