GII ranks 3rd and POWR 8th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
GII vs POWR
POWR −0.01pt a year
0.40%0.39%
POWR 5.4×the volume
41.6K223K
GII +0.9pt
+8.3%+7.4%
GII vs POWR Performance
+60.0%+69.4%
- GII 0.40%
- POWR 0.39%, better
- GII $962M
- POWR $444M
- GII +11.2%, better
- POWR +4.6%
- GII 2.69%
- POWR 6.35%, better
- GII 89
- POWR 73
- GII 41.6K sh
- POWR 223K sh, better
- GII $74.56
- POWR $25.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GII | POWR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A86 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | A72 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A85Higher | A80 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. GII and POWR are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIIA
POWRB
In short
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
POWR Most infrastructure funds blend roads, ports and airports. POWR skips all that for electricity: US energy supply, generation, transmission, distribution and storage, about 70 names, at a fee below the typical infrastructure fund.
Stated mandate
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
POWR The fund seeks exposure to U.S. companies involved across the power infrastructure value chain, including energy supply, generation, transmission, distribution, and storage.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GII vs POWR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GII vs POWR Cost
Overpaying GII vs POWR
$192
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GII 0.40%
$8,090
POWR 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GII | POWR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $705 | $18 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $2,725 | $68 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $7,898 | $192 |
- 0.40%GII
- 0.39%POWR, cheaper
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
POWR 5th cheapest of 33 funds
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
GII vs POWR Dividends
- GII 2.69%
- POWR 6.35%, better
- GII $2.02
- POWR $1.59
- GII $0.78
- POWR $0.08
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- POWR Sep 15, 2026
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- POWR Sep 18, 2026
- GII Twice a year
- POWR Quarterly
Distribution history
GII vs POWR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GII
- POWR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GII 12.5%, betterPOWR 14.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- GII 1.17, betterPOWR 0.14
- Worst fall
- GII −20.7%, betterPOWR −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- GII 0.56POWR 0.47
GII and POWR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


