IFRA ranks 1st and POWR 8th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IFRA vs POWR
IFRA −0.09pt a year
0.30%0.39%
IFRA 1.8×the volume
398K223K
IFRA +1.1pt
+12.2%+11.1%
IFRA vs POWR Performance
+77.5%+69.4%
- IFRA 0.30%, better
- POWR 0.39%
- IFRA $4.07B
- POWR $444M
- IFRA +12.7%, better
- POWR +4.6%
- IFRA 1.74%
- POWR 6.35%, better
- IFRA 165
- POWR 73
- IFRA 398K sh, better
- POWR 223K sh
- IFRA $58.33
- POWR $25.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFRA | POWR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A86 |
| Mission | A83 | A85Higher |
| Risk | B55Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | A95Higher | A75 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A81Higher | A80 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. IFRA and POWR are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFRAA
POWRB
In short
IFRA Most infrastructure funds pick a side: the companies that build the stuff, or the ones that own it. IFRA holds both, stays entirely American, and charges well under the category's typical fee.
POWR Most infrastructure funds blend roads, ports and airports. POWR skips all that for electricity: US energy supply, generation, transmission, distribution and storage, about 70 names, at a fee below the typical infrastructure fund.
Stated mandate
IFRA The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies with infrastructure exposure, balancing infrastructure enablers and infrastructure asset owners.
POWR The fund seeks exposure to U.S. companies involved across the power infrastructure value chain, including energy supply, generation, transmission, distribution, and storage.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFRA vs POWR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFRA vs POWR Cost
Overpaying POWR vs IFRA
$1,749
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFRA 0.30%
$6,149
POWR 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFRA | POWR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $705 | $160 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $2,725 | $612 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $7,898 | $1,749 |
- 0.30%IFRA, cheaper
- 0.39%POWR
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IFRA cheapest of 33 funds
POWR 5th cheapest of 33 funds
IFRA vs POWR Dividends
- IFRA 1.74%
- POWR 6.35%, better
- IFRA $1.02
- POWR $1.59
- IFRA $0.26
- POWR $0.08
- IFRA Sep 15, 2026
- POWR Sep 15, 2026
- IFRA Sep 18, 2026
- POWR Sep 18, 2026
- IFRA Quarterly
- POWR Quarterly
Distribution history
IFRA vs POWR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IFRA
- POWR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFRA 17.2%POWR 14.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IFRA 0.92, betterPOWR 0.14
- Worst fall
- IFRA −19.9%, betterPOWR −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- IFRA 0.96POWR 0.47
IFRA and POWR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



